[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:44:03PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On 19/08/2013 18:19, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > 
> >> (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of 
> >> Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure
> >> boot.
> >> 
> >> This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions
> >> implemented by Simon Glass, that can be in any case used to boot
> >> later a secure image. Freescale's secure boot ensures that a
> >> signed bootloader is started only if it is verified with a key
> >> that is burned into the iMX fuses. Documentation about the
> >> Freescale's secure process can be read from the AN4591, available
> >> on the Freescale's Website.
> > 
> > Where does Marek's patch fall in here exactly?
> 
> Marek's patch is intended to add support for mxs based processor (mx23
> / mx28) and it is quite parallel to mine and I think Marek will
> replace Freescale's own tool elftosb.

But, for clarity, there's not a whole bunch of common code that could be
used here, and these i.MXes are different from those i.MXes?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130819/bcb7b305/attachment.pgp>