From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:21:49 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] spi: mxs: Configure chipselect after block reset In-Reply-To: References: <1377531923-5137-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201308271105.45841.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <201308271121.49918.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Jagan Teki, > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Stefano Babic, > > > >> On 26/08/2013 17:45, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > The chipselect must be written into the CTRL0 register after the SSP > >> > block is reset, otherwise the block will always use ChipSelect #0. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > >> > Cc: Fabio Estevam > >> > Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki > >> > Cc: Otavio Salvador > >> > Cc: Stefano Babic > >> > --- > >> > > >> > drivers/spi/mxs_spi.c | 12 +++--------- > >> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > V2: Clean up a warning that "ssp_regs" are not used > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/mxs_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mxs_spi.c > >> > index 3cf7142..2b9f395 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/spi/mxs_spi.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/spi/mxs_spi.c > >> > @@ -56,8 +56,6 @@ struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, > >> > unsigned int cs, > >> > > >> > unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode) > >> > > >> > { > >> > > >> > struct mxs_spi_slave *mxs_slave; > >> > > >> > - struct mxs_ssp_regs *ssp_regs; > >> > - int reg; > >> > > >> > if (!spi_cs_is_valid(bus, cs)) { > >> > > >> > printf("mxs_spi: invalid bus %d / chip select %d\n", bus, > >> > cs); > >> > > >> > @@ -74,13 +72,7 @@ struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, > >> > unsigned int cs, > >> > > >> > mxs_slave->max_khz = max_hz / 1000; > >> > mxs_slave->mode = mode; > >> > mxs_slave->regs = mxs_ssp_regs_by_bus(bus); > >> > > >> > - ssp_regs = mxs_slave->regs; > >> > > >> > - reg = readl(&ssp_regs->hw_ssp_ctrl0); > >> > - reg &= ~(MXS_SSP_CHIPSELECT_MASK); > >> > - reg |= cs << MXS_SSP_CHIPSELECT_SHIFT; > >> > - > >> > - writel(reg, &ssp_regs->hw_ssp_ctrl0); > >> > > >> > return &mxs_slave->slave; > >> > > >> > err_init: > >> > @@ -102,7 +94,9 @@ int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) > >> > > >> > mxs_reset_block(&ssp_regs->hw_ssp_ctrl0_reg); > >> > > >> > - writel(SSP_CTRL0_BUS_WIDTH_ONE_BIT, &ssp_regs->hw_ssp_ctrl0); > >> > + writel((slave->cs << MXS_SSP_CHIPSELECT_SHIFT) | > >> > + SSP_CTRL0_BUS_WIDTH_ONE_BIT, > >> > + &ssp_regs->hw_ssp_ctrl0); > >> > > >> > reg = SSP_CTRL1_SSP_MODE_SPI | SSP_CTRL1_WORD_LENGTH_EIGHT_BITS; > >> > reg |= (mxs_slave->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SSP_CTRL1_POLARITY : 0; > >> > >> Acked-by: Stefano Babic > > > > Can we push this via IMX tree ? > > I have a simple concern about commit head msg. > spi: mxs: > spi: mxs_spi: > > I preferred the second one as rest are follow the same, just for > unification. Please send the v2, if your OK. then I will push it on my > tree. Can you fix that before pushing? I am fine either way. Best regards, Marek Vasut