[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] dfu: Find DFU alt setting number by passing its name

[Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>]

Hi Heiko, Marek,

> Hello Marek,
> 
> Am 10.09.2013 23:20, schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > Dear Lukasz Majewski,
> >
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >>> Dear Lukasz Majewski,
> >>>
> >>>> New function - dfu_get_alt() has been added to dfu core. If
> >>>> proper alt setting is present, this function returns its number
> >>>> corresponding to passed name.
> >>>>
> >>>> Change-Id: Icd75f3aa3a6f6e306c77b28cabe620e4e6a253ea
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski<l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>>   drivers/dfu/dfu.c |   12 ++++++++++++
> >>>>   include/dfu.h     |    1 +
> >>>>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/dfu/dfu.c b/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> >>>> index 2f1e2af..180d083 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/dfu/dfu.c
> >>>> @@ -414,3 +414,15 @@ struct dfu_entity *dfu_get_entity(int alt)
> >>>>
> >>>>   	return NULL;
> >>>>
> >>>>   }
> >>>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +int dfu_get_alt(const char *name)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	struct dfu_entity *dfu;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	list_for_each_entry(dfu,&dfu_list, list) {
> >>>> +		if (!strncmp(dfu->name, name,
> >>>> strlen(dfu->name)))
> >>>> +			return dfu->alt;
> >>>> +	}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	return -ENODEV;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> diff --git a/include/dfu.h b/include/dfu.h
> >>>> index 7779710..8838f9c 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/dfu.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/dfu.h
> >>>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ const char *dfu_get_layout(enum dfu_layout
> >>>> l);
> >>>>
> >>>>   struct dfu_entity *dfu_get_entity(int alt);
> >>>>   char *dfu_extract_token(char** e, int *n);
> >>>>   void dfu_trigger_reset(void);
> >>>>
> >>>> +int dfu_get_alt(const char *name);
> >>>>
> >>>>   bool dfu_reset(void);
> >>>>
> >>>>   int dfu_read(struct dfu_entity *de, void *buf, int size, int
> >>>>
> >>>> blk_seq_num);
> >>>
> >>> Is this code used anywhere ?
> >>
> >> Hmm.... By mistake I've added part of my ongoing USB related work
> >> to DFU fixes (as you see it is DFU related).
> >>
> >> Since it is (for now) a dead code, please don't consider this
> >> patch.
> >>
> >> Shall I prepare v2 without this patch or will you be so kind and
> >> review other patches in the current patch set?
> >
> > Rest is OK, I'd like to know Heiko's opinion too before applying
> > though.
> 
> Yep, rest of the patches are OK, I tested them on the dxr2 and rut
> boards. So from my side they can go in ... without this patch, as
> it adds dead code. @Lukasz: Please post this patch again, if you
> use this code, thanks!

I will, since I'm developing new USB gadget, which reuses DFU write
backend. 

> 
> bye,
> Heiko



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group