[U-Boot] worth correcting spelling of "redundand"?

[U-Boot] worth correcting spelling of "redundand"?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  again, my pedantry getting the best of me but it makes me cringe
whenever i run across the spelling "redundand" (tree-wide search):

common/env_ubi.c:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
common/env_ubi.c:#else /* ! CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT */
common/env_ubi.c:#endif /* CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT */
common/env_ubi.c:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
common/env_ubi.c:#else /* ! CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT */
common/env_ubi.c:#endif /* CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT */
common/env_embedded.c:env_t redundand_environment __PPCENV__ = {
include/environment.h:#  define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/environment.h:#  define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/environment.h:#   define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/environment.h:#  define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/environment.h:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/environment.h:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/env_default.h:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/configs/G2000.h:#else	/* DEFAULT: environment in flash, using redundand flash sectors */
include/configs/km/km_arm.h:#define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/configs/PPChameleonEVB.h:#else	/* DEFAULT: environment in flash, using redundand flash sectors */
include/configs/mx28evk.h:#define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/configs/am335x_evm.h:#define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/configs/omap5_uevm.h:#define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
include/configs/igep0033.h:#define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
tools/envcrc.c:#  define CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
tools/envcrc.c:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT

  this obviously isn't a cosmetic change as it's used in numerous
#defines, but if it's done all at once, it should be safe. i can
submit a patch unless people feel it's simply too disruptive.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

[U-Boot] worth correcting spelling of "redundand"?

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Robert,

On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 04:30:09 -0400 (EDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
<rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:

> 
>   again, my pedantry getting the best of me but it makes me cringe
> whenever i run across the spelling "redundand" (tree-wide search):
> 
> common/env_ubi.c:#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT
> [...]
> 
>   this obviously isn't a cosmetic change as it's used in numerous
> #defines, but if it's done all at once, it should be safe. i can
> submit a patch unless people feel it's simply too disruptive.

As a general rule, you don't need to ask before submitting a patch
unless you're really doing intrusive and potentially disruptive work
and want some feedback without risking getting bad code mainlined, in
which case... you'd still submit a patch, only tagged RFC. :)

IOW: just submit the patch; after all, the worst possible outcome is
only a NAK if you missed something important.

Here, just submit a patch with a summary line / subject like "fix
CONFIG_SYS_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT typo".

> rday

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.