public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Merge and reformat boards.cfg and MAINTAINERS
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:29:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919082949.1ea52c7f@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130917095500.738E.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com>

Hi Masahiro,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:55:00 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:

> Hello Albert, Tom.
> 
> 
> Commit 27af930e9 added Active/Orphan status in the first column of boards.cfg.
> 
> Could you tell the definition of "Active" and "Orphan".
> 
> 
> At first I imagined Orphan means a board without maintainer.
> But the maintainer information is missing from lots of Active boards.
> So I could not find the difference between Active and Orphan.

I have listed as "Orphan" any board mentioned in the "unknown / orphan"
sections of the original MAINTAINERS file.

If you look at the original MAINTAINERS, you'll see that some boards
were listed under a maintainer e-mail, and some boards were listed
under "unknown / orphan"; but not all boards were listed.

I set the board state in the new board.cfg to "Orphan" if and only
if the board was listed in such an "unknown / orphan" section, and to
"Active in any other case". This implies that:

- some boards were present in the old boards.cfg but not listed in
  MAINTAINERS (e.g. sh7785lcr), which means there are "Active" boards
  which do not have a maintainer;

- some "unknown / orphan" boards had a "last known maintainer address"
  specified (e.g. EVB64260_750CX), which means there are "Orphan" boards
  which have a maintainer listed.

IOW, a board's state (Active or Orphan) has no formal relationship with
this board having maintainers or not; the state only determines whether
this board should be built (Active) or not (Orphan).

Note that I have verified that ./MAKEALL -a arm built the same boards,
although I have not verified this for other architectures; and
that ./MAKEALL -m listed the same boards and maintainers (or more
exactly, listed the same boards and attributed the correct maintainers,
as some of the old ./MAKEALL -m output was incorrect), at meast for ARM
and PowerPC.

> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-19  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-10 19:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Merge and reformat boards.cfg and MAINTAINERS Albert ARIBAUD
2013-09-11 13:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Albert ARIBAUD
2013-09-12 15:11   ` Tom Rini
2013-09-17  0:55     ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-09-19  6:29       ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2013-09-27 11:05         ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-10-03 21:32           ` Albert ARIBAUD
     [not found]   ` <7B43E01F5906F9448BF8BAACD5D26B3803CA11@DENBGAT9EH2MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
2013-09-15  5:36     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-09-16  6:55       ` Meier, Roger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130919082949.1ea52c7f@lilith \
    --to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox