From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:26:14 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 3/8] ARM: add assembly routine to switch to
 non-secure state
In-Reply-To: <CAPUj1ON5h9mViHkVYC213d_7iHfb9_bJRCFrDipJ0f7Fnm=uyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1379606806-439-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@linaro.org>
	<1379606806-439-4-git-send-email-andre.przywara@linaro.org>
	<CAPUj1ON5h9mViHkVYC213d_7iHfb9_bJRCFrDipJ0f7Fnm=uyw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130919192614.GM7623@lvm>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00:03PM +0530, Mj Embd wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> 
> There is another approach taken in xen. (xen/arch/arm/mode_switch.S)
> Which do you think is the better approach
> 
Hi there,

I'm not sure I completely understand your question.  Do you think this
patch series should be changed to take something from Xen?  If so, can
you please clarify why?

For the record, this patch series has been reviewed and tested quite a
lot for U-Boot and we would very much like to get this merged and avoid
further churn, unless there's a compelling technical reason to change
it.

Thanks,
-Christoffer