From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:24:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V5 00/18] Make mv_udc work for i.mx6
In-Reply-To: <5244876E.7090908@boundarydevices.com>
References: <1380159678-26416-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
	<52445E51.8050800@denx.de> <5244876E.7090908@boundarydevices.com>
Message-ID: <201309262224.18075.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Troy Kisky,

> On 9/26/2013 9:18 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > Hi Troy, Marek,
> > 
> > On 26/09/2013 03:41, Troy Kisky wrote:
> >> Stefano, if you would you like to take the last 3 patches,
> >> you should apply "i.MX6Q/DLS: Add MX6_PAD_GPIO_1__USB_OTG_ID"
> >> from Eric Nelson first.
> > 
> > Eric's patch is already in my queue, I will apply it.
> > 
> >> The patches are mostly independent, so if a patch has
> >> an issue, please feel free to skip it.
> >> An exception is 1/17 should be before 2/17 if Stefano's branch merges
> >> upstream first, otherwise nitrogen6x will get a build error.
> > 
> > Maybe it is better if we agree who merge the patchset to avoid breaking
> > the boards (Nitrogen). Mostly the patchset is Marek's stuff, and I have
> > nothing again if Marek will apply also the i.MX relevant parts. It is
> > better to merge this patchset at whole in the same tree as to split it.
> > 
> > Marek, do you agree ?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Stefano
> 
> Then Marek would need Eric's patch, unless a temporary build error is
> acceptable.

This will go to -next anyway, so if Stefano can pick this OTG_ID mux patch into 
master and push it out into current MW, there will be no problem at all.

I'll pick the whole thing otherwise but only AFTER I reviewed it properly.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut