From: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] mtd: Fix function description in part_validate comment
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:06:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130928150616.0178cb54@e6520eb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380338659-7896-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Hi Otavio,
Le Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:24:12 -0300,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> a ?crit :
> The part_validate comment had a wrong description of the actions it
> does and referenced to non-existent functions while in fact it calls
> 'part_validate_eraseblock()'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> ---
> common/cmd_mtdparts.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c
> index 3023479..0104285 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_mtdparts.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_mtdparts.c
> @@ -381,10 +381,10 @@ static int part_validate_eraseblock(struct mtdids *id, struct part_info *part)
>
>
> /**
> - * Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are verified
> - * to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and either
> - * parts_validate_nor() or parts_validate_nand() is called with the argument
> - * of part.
> + * Performs sanity check for supplied partition. Offset and size are
> + * verified to be within valid range. Partition type is checked and
> + * either part_validate_eraseblock() is called with the argument of
and now you can remove either ;-)
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-28 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-28 3:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] mtd: Fix function description in part_validate comment Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 3:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] doc: Fix a typo in the description in doc/README.JFFS2_NAND Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 3:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] include/linux/fb.h: Add a missing include for 'list.h' Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 16:46 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-28 3:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] gpio-led: Use __led_set in __led_init code Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 3:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] gpio-led: Fix __led_toggle support to first set GPIO as input Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 13:12 ` Eric Bénard
2013-09-28 16:35 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-28 19:05 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 3:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] status_led: Add support for inverted LEDs Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 14:17 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-09-28 16:49 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-28 19:08 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-09-29 13:40 ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-09-28 3:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] cmd_led: Add support for inverted BIT leds Otavio Salvador
2013-09-28 13:06 ` Eric Bénard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130928150616.0178cb54@e6520eb \
--to=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox