From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:29:12 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: bcm2835: add missing mbox overscan
 response field
In-Reply-To: <20131023194631.GA29233@gmail.com>
References: <1382473641-20614-1-git-send-email-a.heider@gmail.com>
	<5267FF35.3060901@wwwdotorg.org> <20131023194631.GA29233@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20131107142912.2ddbedab@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Andre,

On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:31 +0200, Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
> > > Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
> > 
> > This one patch,
> > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
> > 
> > You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM
> > patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in
> > patchwork?
> 
> Okay, I did the patchwork dance :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Andre

In fact, the series could be applied as a whole by the same custodian
-- and actually, I'd prefer it to be applied as a whole, since patch 1/2
alone looks like dead/useless code, whereas it makes sense if applied
along with 2/2.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.