From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot gerrit server
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:23:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131114212307.GG420@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC3GErFQZf9uSr9f6PD9n592C95NZd=V61dHFkKGrkkbbWpmvQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:13:37PM -0800, Vadim Bendebury (????) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:06:49PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:14:13PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> > [snip]
> >> >
> >> >> What I think it'd be possible to get working would be:
> >> >>
> >> >> Custodians would have Submit rights
> >> >> Custodians would have +2 review rights
> >> >> "Normal" people would have +1 review rights
> >> >> CI system could have the +1 for verified
> >> >> Single tree
> >> >>
> >> >> So essentially custodians could be assigned using some keyword, file
> >> >> matching and other clever heuristics, but it'd give freedom for them
> >> >> to 'drop' their review need or add someone else. Once they submit a
> >> >> change it goes straight to 'master' branch.
> >> >>
> >> >> This easy the merging of stuff but this ends with the sub-trees.
> >> >
> >> > This sounds like a first good step to me. It's important that things
> >> > get reviewed and everyone seems to be able to see the difference between
> >> > "this is a small change to $subsystem driver for $soc, $soc custodian
> >> > can just push it" and "this is a big change, $subsystem custodian should
> >> > speak up too". But I still want a final say on when things are able to
> >> > be merged into master
> >>
> >> In this case, you could be the only one with 'submit' rights. So
> >> everything would be just 'awaiting' for submit.
> >
> > And custodian should still be able to easily pull together a list of
> > stuff they're happy with, change sets I guess?
>
> Presumably the custodians will have their own copy of their branch,
> they could upload patches to the master branch for merging into
> master.
Sorry for not being clear. I'm thinking of the single-tree approach
where custodians don't have separate trees per-se but provide changesets
they want merged or some other mechanism to include the N changes
they're happy with and have reviewed.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20131114/04f24bd0/attachment.pgp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 5:21 [U-Boot] u-boot gerrit server Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-12 5:36 ` Simon Glass
2013-11-12 10:42 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-11-12 16:33 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-12 17:11 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-11-12 18:05 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-12 11:07 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-12 16:36 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-12 16:47 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-12 16:55 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-12 17:00 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-12 17:07 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-12 17:14 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-14 19:27 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 20:06 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-14 20:17 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 20:30 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-14 20:58 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 21:00 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-14 21:20 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 21:13 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-14 21:18 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-14 21:23 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2013-11-12 17:13 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-11-12 17:16 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-12 17:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-11-12 18:07 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-12 18:24 ` Vadim Bendebury
2013-11-13 22:39 ` Scott Wood
2013-11-12 18:28 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-11-12 19:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-12 19:26 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-12 19:46 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-14 19:54 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 20:59 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-14 21:17 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 21:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-15 19:41 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-14 23:43 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-15 13:55 ` James Chargin
2013-11-15 14:12 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-11-15 14:29 ` Luca Ellero
2013-11-15 20:08 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-15 21:00 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-11-15 21:34 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-15 23:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-15 23:24 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-17 16:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-17 19:41 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-18 0:07 ` Graeme Russ
2013-11-18 16:00 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-19 4:29 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-11-19 7:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-19 18:08 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-11-19 15:10 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-19 18:12 ` Heiko Schocher
2013-11-15 23:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-16 23:45 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-11-15 19:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-15 19:40 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-15 23:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-16 1:39 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-17 19:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-18 9:35 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-11-18 16:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-11-18 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2013-11-19 17:21 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
2013-11-20 7:42 ` Graeme Russ
2013-11-20 20:11 ` Vadim Bendebury (вб)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131114212307.GG420@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox