[U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6: nitrogen6x: update memory configuration files to use macros

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Dear Eric Nelson,

> This patch updates the memory configuration files for the Nitrogen6X
> boards to use macros to define the output for imximage. This allows
> re-use of the same files of register/value pairs to be included from C
> as a pre-cursor to run-time detection of the memory size on a board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
> ---
>  board/boundary/nitrogen6x/1066mhz_4x128mx16.cfg | 72
> ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/1066mhz_4x256mx16.cfg
> | 72 ++++++++++++-------------
> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_2x128mx16.cfg  | 72
> ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_2x256mx16.cfg 
> | 72 ++++++++++++-------------
> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_4x128mx16.cfg  | 72
> ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_4x256mx16.cfg 
> | 72 ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6dl.cfg  
>     |  1 +
>  board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6dl2g.cfg     |  1 +
>  board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6q.cfg        |  1 +
>  board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6q2g.cfg      |  1 +
>  board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6s.cfg        |  1 +
>  board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6s1g.cfg      |  1 +
>  12 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)

I dont mind either way, but just an idea for discussion:

What do you say to implementing the DRAM controller programming in SPL? That 
way, we can even do proper DRAM calibration on boot and other such nice things. 
And we'd also get rid of these static magic numbers all around.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut