[U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6: nitrogen6x: update memory configuration files to use macros

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Dear Eric Nelson,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 11/14/2013 02:20 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Eric Nelson,
> > 
> >> This patch updates the memory configuration files for the Nitrogen6X
> >> boards to use macros to define the output for imximage. This allows
> >> re-use of the same files of register/value pairs to be included from C
> >> as a pre-cursor to run-time detection of the memory size on a board.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/1066mhz_4x128mx16.cfg | 72
> >> 
> >> ++++++++++++-------------
> >> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/1066mhz_4x256mx16.cfg
> >> 
> >> | 72 ++++++++++++-------------
> >> 
> >> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_2x128mx16.cfg  | 72
> >> ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_2x256mx16.cfg
> >> 
> >> | 72 ++++++++++++-------------
> >> 
> >> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_4x128mx16.cfg  | 72
> >> ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/800mhz_4x256mx16.cfg
> >> 
> >> | 72 ++++++++++++------------- board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6dl.cfg
> >> | 
> >>      |  1 +
> >>   
> >>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6dl2g.cfg     |  1 +
> >>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6q.cfg        |  1 +
> >>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6q2g.cfg      |  1 +
> >>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6s.cfg        |  1 +
> >>   board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6s1g.cfg      |  1 +
> >>   12 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I dont mind either way, but just an idea for discussion:
> > 
> > What do you say to implementing the DRAM controller programming in SPL?
> > That way, we can even do proper DRAM calibration on boot and other such
> > nice things. And we'd also get rid of these static magic numbers all
> > around.
> 
> We can (and hopefully will very soon) implement some of the
> configuration in C under SPL, but we can't (and shouldn't) get
> rid of all of the magic numbers.

That would be really nice.

> Some of these numbers come from testing large numbers of devices
> under a variety of temperature conditions. The best that the
> automagic calibration facilities can do is set things up based
> on nominal current conditions.

This is what I'm concerned about. On the other hand, the DRAM controller in 
iMXes does run-time recalibration of the DDR, does it not ?

> That said, I'm sure we can cut down on the total number.

Absolutely. And if we cannot do runtime calibration, we could at least have 
support for multiple boards in a single image.
 
> My immediate goal is simply to set the stage for SPL and
> a single binary.

Full ACK on this course ;-)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut