public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARMv7: add PSCI support to u-boot
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:49:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131122164939.GI9314@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhSdy1047PtL0Nm3T1Mjr7teBy6FuGV9n04R=K_uowbv81NzQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:30:27PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 09:28 +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> >> An Independent binary of a secured firmware makes more sense here.
> >> Also, if secured firmware is an independent binary then it need not be
> >> open source.
> >
> > In which case it should/can not have anything to do with u-boot nor
> > reuse any GPL'd u-boot code. The platform should supply the PSCI service
> > itself if you want to do this.
> >
> > I for one don't see this as an advantage.
> 
> Further, independent secure firmware can be also used by UEFI or other
> bootloaders.
> 
> For now we just need secure firmware loading service from u-boot, which
> is what this patchset does.
> 
As I see it this patchset seeks to provide (and does a good job of it)
you with PSCI services on platforms where you don't already have this,
so you avoid having to implement yet another platform-specific SMP
boot-up sequence in the kernel.  This is not about providing any generic
support for secure firmware.

Ideally, the platform would just ship with PSCI support and boot U-Boot
in Hyp mode and everyone would be happy - whichever way vendors wish to
do that is a completely different discussion than this patch set.

-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-22 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-21  8:59 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] ARMv7: add PSCI support to u-boot Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21  8:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: fix alignment requirements for vectors Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21 10:19   ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-11-21 10:36     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21 22:24   ` Andre Przywara
2013-11-21  8:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: move switch to non-sec to the last boot phase Marc Zyngier
2013-11-26 14:36   ` Andre Przywara
2013-11-21  8:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: add a barrier after setting SCR.NS==1 Marc Zyngier
2013-11-22  1:51   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-22 10:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-22 16:53       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-30  3:10     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec switch in bootm.c TigerLiu at viatech.com.cn
2013-12-30  4:57       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-30  5:15         ` TigerLiu at viatech.com.cn
2013-12-30  5:22           ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-30  5:33             ` TigerLiu at viatech.com.cn
2013-11-26 14:39   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: add a barrier after setting SCR.NS==1 Andre Przywara
2013-11-21  8:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] ARM: non-sec: reset CNTVOFF to zero Marc Zyngier
2013-11-26 14:41   ` Andre Przywara
2013-11-26 14:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21  8:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: add generic ARMv7 PSCI code Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21  8:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: make pen code sections depend on !ARMV7_PSCI Marc Zyngier
2014-06-04  1:51   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: make pen code sectionsdepend " TigerLiu at via-alliance.com
2013-11-21  9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] ARM: HYP/non-sec: add the option for a second-stage monitor Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21  9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] sunxi: HYP/non-sec: add sun7i PSCI backend Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21  9:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] sunxi: HYP/non-sec: configure CNTFRQ on all CPUs Marc Zyngier
2013-11-21 14:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] ARMv7: add PSCI support to u-boot Rob Herring
2013-11-21 15:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-22  1:54     ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-22  3:58       ` Anup Patel
2013-11-22  8:42         ` [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] " Ian Campbell
2013-11-22  9:00           ` Anup Patel
2013-11-22 16:49             ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2013-11-22 10:25         ` [U-Boot] " Marc Zyngier
2013-11-22 10:51       ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-22  8:40     ` [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] " Ian Campbell
2013-11-22  8:56       ` Anup Patel
2013-11-22 10:49         ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-22 14:51       ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-06 11:43 ` [U-Boot] " Andre Przywara
2013-12-06 12:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-06 12:59     ` [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] " Ian Campbell
2013-12-06 15:44       ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-06 15:48         ` Andre Przywara
2013-12-06 17:21           ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-06 17:45             ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-06 13:03     ` [U-Boot] " Andre Przywara
2013-12-06 16:00       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131122164939.GI9314@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox