From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci: exynos: set/reset hsic phys
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:45:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401061645.56005.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG17yqRdbupqcMNrWf1e+j1aTQtkyOPkF6GDvspEx46mZjR0fg@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, January 06, 2014 at 07:20:20 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> On 4 January 2014 12:46, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Friday, January 03, 2014 at 06:03:47 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review.
> > >
> > > On 3 January 2014 06:24, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 02, 2014 at 10:41:58 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> > > > > From: Inderpal Singh <chander.kashyap@linaro.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > The controller has 3 ports. The port0 is for USB 2.0 Phy, port1 and
> > > > > port2 are for HSIC phys. The usb 2.0 phy is already being setup.
> > > > > This patch sets up the hsic phys.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/ehci.h | 14 +++++++++++
> > > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 39
> > > > >
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > Is it OK to set all the ports up unconditionally ? I am not sure
> > > > about exynos of
> > > > course, but is it possible there are some machines which don't use
> > > > the HSIC ports and this would have some kind of adverse effects on
> > > > those?
> > >
> > > I feel it should not cause any side effect as it wont interfere with
> > > the normal USB 2.0 phy port. Also, its being done along the same lines
> > > as kernel driver at drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c, which also
> > > sets up
> >
> > all
> >
> > > ports unconditionally.
> >
> > OK, I won't fight this. I would be much more inclined to being able to
> > conditionally select which ports get configured. Especially, since you do
> > know
> > that information from DT, dont you?
>
> Ok, Thanks Marek.
> As of now DT is not providing port information.
Bah, I'd expect -- especially in case of exynos, which is targetting the mobile
segment -- to focus on power consumption very much. Anyway, like I said, I won't
fight this. Minkyu, what's your take on this one please?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-06 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-02 9:41 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add usb ethernet support for Arndale Inderpal Singh
2014-01-02 9:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci: exynos: set/reset hsic phys Inderpal Singh
2014-01-03 0:54 ` Marek Vasut
2014-01-03 5:03 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-01-04 7:16 ` Marek Vasut
2014-01-06 6:20 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-01-06 15:45 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2014-01-07 5:19 ` Minkyu Kang
2014-01-02 9:41 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: exynos5: arndale: Add network support Inderpal Singh
2014-01-03 0:56 ` Marek Vasut
2014-01-03 5:14 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-01-04 7:19 ` Marek Vasut
2014-01-06 6:22 ` Inderpal Singh
2014-01-06 15:46 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201401061645.56005.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox