[U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Fix entries for S25FL256S_256K and S25FL512S_256K

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 03:29:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix,
> compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also,
> they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaganna@xilinx.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Note: Would be nice if someone actually tested this fix as I go by the
>       datasheet and by the old code that _was_ in U-Boot before the rework.

btw. would be nice to get this one into current release to prevent it being 
broken. But I would _really_ appreciate some real-hardware testing here.

> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
> index daf8fe7..5f63023 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
> @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] =
> { {"S25FL032P",	   0x010215, 0x4d00,    64 * 1024,    64, RD_FULL,	
	    
> WR_QPP}, {"S25FL064P",	   0x010216, 0x4d00,    64 * 1024,   128,
> RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP}, {"S25FL128S_64K",  0x012018, 0x4d01,    64 
* 1024,
>   256, RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP}, -	{"S25FL256S_256K", 0x010219, 
0x4d00,   
> 64 * 1024,   512, RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP}, +	{"S25FL256S_256K", 
0x010219,
> 0x4d00,   256 * 1024,   128, RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP}, {"S25FL256S_64K", 
> 0x010219, 0x4d01,	64 * 1024,   512, RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP},
> -	{"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00,    64 * 1024,  1024, RD_FULL,	
	    
> WR_QPP}, +	{"S25FL512S_256K", 0x010220, 0x4d00,   256 * 1024,   256,
> RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP}, {"S25FL512S_64K",  0x010220, 0x4d01,    64 
* 1024,
>  1024, RD_FULL,		     WR_QPP}, #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO		/* STMICRO */

Best regards,
Marek Vasut