From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:41:37 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Fix entries for S25FL256S_256K and
	S25FL512S_256K
In-Reply-To: <CAD6G_RSAauusNPUvypEk4xqQt7iXE5K=vzJe57DpwiHtzO7VWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1389796183-5251-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
	<201401151536.36462.marex@denx.de>
	<CAD6G_RSAauusNPUvypEk4xqQt7iXE5K=vzJe57DpwiHtzO7VWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201401151641.37421.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 04:17:55 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 03:29:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix,
> >> compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also,
> >> they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jaganna@xilinx.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> Note: Would be nice if someone actually tested this fix as I go by the
> >> 
> >>       datasheet and by the old code that _was_ in U-Boot before the
> >>       rework.
> > 
> > btw. would be nice to get this one into current release to prevent it
> > being broken. But I would _really_ appreciate some real-hardware testing
> > here.
> 
> Yes - I'll try it and let us know.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Marek Vasut