From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] part_efi: fix protective_mbr struct allocation
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:33:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140212173329.057a0c87@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5Azo_w5sjP3GD8_WoAx=NXO6thFdFiNBwGHYO0DiNSJ1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Fabio,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:43:02 -0200, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Hector Palacios
> <hector.palacios@digi.com> wrote:
> > The calloc() call was allocating space for the sizeof the struct
> > pointer rather than for the struct contents.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
> > ---
> > disk/part_efi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
> > index 5dfaf490c89a..7fabec059d7a 100644
> > --- a/disk/part_efi.c
> > +++ b/disk/part_efi.c
> > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int set_protective_mbr(block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc)
> > legacy_mbr *p_mbr;
> >
> > /* Setup the Protective MBR */
> > - p_mbr = calloc(1, sizeof(p_mbr));
> > + p_mbr = calloc(1, sizeof(legacy_mbr));
>
> What about:
>
> p_mbr = calloc(1, sizeof(*p_mbr)) ?
I don't like the idea of setting p_mbr based on *p_mbr at a time where
p_mbr is still undefined. I know that from a C standard perspective
this is ok, but I'd rather simply not run any risk and pass sizeof
the struct type, not a (non-existent) dereferenced 'value'.
> Regards,
>
> Fabio Estevam
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 14:40 [U-Boot] [PATCH] part_efi: fix protective_mbr struct allocation Hector Palacios
2014-02-12 14:43 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-02-12 16:33 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2014-02-12 17:33 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-02-12 17:58 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-12 15:55 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-02-12 16:24 ` Palacios, Hector
2014-02-12 16:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-12 16:48 ` Palacios, Hector
2014-02-12 20:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-02-13 2:23 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-19 8:19 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-02-19 10:08 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-19 10:15 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-19 12:52 ` Palacios, Hector
2014-02-19 14:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-19 14:25 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-02-19 14:38 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-19 15:11 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-02-19 14:22 ` Tom Rini
2014-02-19 15:10 ` Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140212173329.057a0c87@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox