From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:14:31 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] arm/km: drop unneeded define
In-Reply-To: <52FCB64B.1020207@keymile.com>
References: <1390838309-11672-1-git-send-email-holger.brunck@keymile.com>
	<20140213130610.1b55d911@lilith> <52FCB64B.1020207@keymile.com>
Message-ID: <20140213131431.68f5ce7c@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Holger,

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:10:51 +0100, Holger Brunck
<holger.brunck@keymile.com> wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> On 02/13/2014 01:06 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > For the whole series: shouldn't the keymile boards maintainer be CC:ed?
> > 
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:58:22 +0100, Holger Brunck
> > <holger.brunck@keymile.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_LIMIT is used on all boards from this board series. So
> >> remove this unneeded define.
> > 
> > What if a new board/config does not want to use a bootcount limit?
> > 
> 
> all keymile boards use this and I don't see a usecase now and in the future that
> a board don't need it, thats why I decided to remove this here. IMHO it makes
> the code more readable to make only configurable what really needs to be
> configurable.

Alright. And what about the keymile boards maintainer?

> Best regards
> Holger

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.