From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:19:04 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] part_efi: fix protective_mbr struct allocation In-Reply-To: <20140213032316.489d3347@lilith> References: <1392216053-10344-1-git-send-email-hector.palacios@digi.com> <20140212165558.100c71cb@amdc2363> <663FBF285582E7408575E1A5C8B86A57ABEA7A4EC9@dor-sms-exch01.digi.com> <20140212173051.04624a91@lilith> <663FBF285582E7408575E1A5C8B86A57ABEA7A4ECA@dor-sms-exch01.digi.com> <20140212214541.792d304c@jawa> <20140213032316.489d3347@lilith> Message-ID: <20140219091904.055671f0@amdc2363> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Albert, Tom > Hi Lukasz, > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:45:41 +0100, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > > > I think, that the patch for fixing the unaligned access in this > > function has already been posted by Piotr Wilczek. We have > > experienced similar issues with Samsung's Exynos4 based targets. > > > > [PATCH V2] disk:efi: avoid unaligned access on efi partition > > > > Despite its disappearance from patchwork it shall be available at > > mailing list archive. > > > > The v1 can be found at the following link: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/282753/ > > Neither V1 nor V2 have disappeared from patchwork. A "filter" on the > subject, selecting "any" state and "both" archived and non-archived > patches will return both: > > V1: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/282753/ (New) > V2: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/314717/ (Deferred) > > (I think that the patchwork web interface does not make it possible at > all to remove a patch anyway) Thanks for pointing out. Now it is perfectly visible :-) > > > Inclusion of v2 has been postponed since there was a discussion if > > we shall allow unaligned access (-mno-unaligned-access flag) at > > armv7 (after patches posted by Tom). > > > > As fair as I can tell, we will keep the current approach so, I think > > that Tom will be willing to pull this patch (v2) now. > > Agreed, but then we should make sure no one has comments on V2 that > they might have withheld due to the initial rejection of V2. Any comments? This patch do fix unaligned access problem on Trats2 (Exynos4412), when we restore/create GPT, so I would like to know if there are any new inquires regarding this patch. > > > Best regards, > > Lukasz Majewski > > Amicalement, -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group