[U-Boot] [PATCH] part_efi: fix protective_mbr struct allocation

[Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>]

Hi Hector,

On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:52:07 +0100, "Palacios, Hector"
<Hector.Palacios@digi.com> wrote:

> On 02/19/2014 11:16 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:08:03 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> >
> >>> Thanks for pointing out. Now it is perfectly visible :-)
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Inclusion of v2 has been postponed since there was a discussion if
> >>>>> we shall allow unaligned access (-mno-unaligned-access flag) at
> >>>>> armv7 (after patches posted by Tom).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As fair as I can tell, we will keep the current approach so, I think
> >>>>> that Tom will be willing to pull this patch (v2) now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Agreed, but then we should make sure no one has comments on V2 that
> >>>> they might have withheld due to the initial rejection of V2.
> >>>
> >>> Any comments?
> >>>
> >>> This patch do fix unaligned access problem on Trats2 (Exynos4412), when
> >>> we restore/create GPT, so I would like to know if there are any new
> >>> inquires regarding this patch.
> >>
> >> Does not seem to be, so I will apply V2.
> >
> > Correction: I would like it to be applied as per current ARM alignment
> > policy, but this patch is not ARM per se and is in Tom's hands.
> >
> > Tom, can you apply http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/314717/ ? This
> > would by no means close the discussion I opened, and in the event
> > of a policy change, the patch could always be reverted; meanwhile, it
> > matches our current policy.
> 
> I tested Piotr's patch on i.MX6 (armv7) custom board and it is working fine without 
> the -mno-unaligned-access flag.
> 
> Tested-by: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>

You've just Tested-By-ed your own patch, I think.

... but I am the one to blame, and should not have discussed Piotr's
patch in this thread.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.