[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] nand_spl: display warning message to inform the end of nand_spl

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 03:20:27PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 26.02.2014 09:51, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >Now we have two different frameworks for doing the same thing.
> >I'd like to propose to drop nand_spl framework.
> >How about deleting it before v2014.07 release?
> >
> >In the interim, this commit will display a warning message
> >when compiling nand_spl board.
> >
> >Now we have 19 nand_spl boards:
> >
> >   MPC8315ERDB_NAND
> >   SIMPC8313_LP
> >   SIMPC8313_SP
> >   MPC8536DS_NAND
> >   MPC8569MDS_NAND
> >   MPC8572DS_NAND
> >   P1023RDS_NAND
> >   P1011RDB_NAND
> >   P1020RDB_NAND
> >   P2010RDB_NAND
> >   P2020RDB_NAND
> >   acadia_nand
> >   bamboo_nand
> >   canyonlands_nand
> >   glacier_nand
> >   haleakala_nand
> >   kilauea_nand
> >   rainier_nand
> >   sequoia_nand
> >
> >They must be ported to SPL before the deadline,
> >otherwise they will be removed.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
> >Cc: Dave Liu <daveliu@freescale.com>
> >Cc: Ron Madrid <info@sheldoninst.com>
> >Cc: Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
> >Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> 
> The AMCC/APM PPC4xx NAND booting boards, which were used to
> introduce the nand_spl infrastructure, are practically unmaintained.
> There doesn't seem to be much interest in porting those boards to
> the SPL infrastructure. So I'm fine with the date as well:
> 
> Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>

In that case can you please post a patch to remove them now?  Or if you
really want, we can delay until v2014.04 is out.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140226/23ea08cb/attachment.pgp>