public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] arm64: Do not double -mstrict-align option
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:08:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226230818.7c67db8a@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140226220308.GF16805@bill-the-cat>

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:03:08 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:58:10PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:55:43 -0500, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:51:05PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Seeing arch/arm/cpu/armv8/config.mk, -mstrict-align option
> > > > was added to both PLATFORM_NO_UNALIGNED and PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS.
> > > > 
> > > > $(PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS) is given to all compiled objects.
> > > > Adding the same option to also PLATFORM_NO_UNALIGNED is
> > > > redundant.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, common/hush.o was compiled with double -mstrict-align.
> > > > You can comfirm it by checking common/.hush.o.cmd file.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
> > > > Cc: David Feng <fenghua@phytium.com.cn>
> > > > Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> > > > Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > With the v3 series about unaligned bits this patch should no longer be
> > > needed.
> > 
> > Hmm... This patch is about not repeating -mstrict-align twice, which is
> > a bug unrelated with switching to -mno-unaligned-access.
> > 
> > Besides, -mstrict-align means "Don't assume that unaligned accesses are
> > handled", which I think is for aarch64 what -mno-unaligned-access is
> > for arm(32), so it *should* be specified.
> 
> Yes, but my patch cleaned up the places that set PLATFORM_NO_UNALIGNED
> so this duplication was dropped.

Oh, ok. My bad, then.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-26 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  5:50 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] Kbuild: A collection of trivial refactoring Masahiro Yamada
2014-02-26  5:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] config.mk: Delete unused variable BCURDIR Masahiro Yamada
2014-03-04 19:15   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini
2014-02-26  5:50 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] Makefile: delete unused variable LDSCRIPT_MAKEFILE_DIR Masahiro Yamada
2014-03-04 19:15   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini
2014-02-26  5:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] nand_spl: simpc8313: move config.mk used only for nand_spl Masahiro Yamada
2014-03-04 19:15   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini
2014-02-26  5:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] x86: Delete redundant compiler flags Masahiro Yamada
2014-02-27 20:44   ` Simon Glass
2014-03-04 19:15   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot,4/8] " Tom Rini
2014-02-26  5:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8] sh: Do not define -ffreestanding twice Masahiro Yamada
2014-02-27 21:24   ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2014-02-28  3:39     ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-03-04 20:37       ` Tom Rini
2014-03-05  0:45         ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2014-03-05  2:10           ` Tom Rini
2014-02-26  5:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] sh: merge compiler flag -ffixed-r13 Masahiro Yamada
2014-02-27 21:24   ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2014-02-26  5:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/8] m68k: merge compile flags -ffixed-d7 -sep-data Masahiro Yamada
2014-03-04 19:16   ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Tom Rini
2014-02-26  5:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] arm64: Do not double -mstrict-align option Masahiro Yamada
2014-02-26 13:55   ` Tom Rini
2014-02-26 21:58     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-02-26 22:03       ` Tom Rini
2014-02-26 22:08         ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2014-02-26 13:56 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] Kbuild: A collection of trivial refactoring Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140226230818.7c67db8a@lilith \
    --to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox