From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 06:45:15 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/8] ums: move all variable declarations to the
	start of the block
In-Reply-To: <53627D4A.6000401@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1398892402-9816-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
	<201405011251.25998.marex@denx.de> <53627D4A.6000401@wwwdotorg.org>
Message-ID: <201405020645.15539.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thursday, May 01, 2014 at 06:58:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 04:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 11:13:21 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> >> 
> >> It's easier to assign values to the variables inside an if statement
> >> body if the assignment and declaration are separate.
> >> 
> >> Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
> >> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  common/cmd_usb_mass_storage.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This doesn't apply on u-boot-usb/master, sorry.
> 
> Is this the first patch in the series which doesn't apply? Did you apply
> any of the earlier patches? I guess I'll go try to rebase the series and
> find out myself...

7/8 doesn't apply .

> This is why we need a "uboot-next" just like linux-next, and stricter
> controls on which git repos take patches that touch subsystem code, to
> avoid cross-repo conflicts:-(

Yep, u-boot-next would be nice and so would be u-boot-stable . Volunteers 
welcome ;-)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut