From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v4 2/5] ARMv8: Adjust MMU setup
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 18:32:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140606173243.GC18918@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5391D639.4080700@freescale.com>
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 03:54:49PM +0100, York Sun wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 05:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>>>> What you need to do to replace the active set of tables (assuming that
> >>>>> the new mapping has the instruction stream mapped in an identical way)
> >>>>> is:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Write the tables.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - DSB to make them visible to the MMU.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Write to the appropriate TTBR_*.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - ISB to complete the write to the TTBR_*.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - TLBI to invalidate the old mappings the the TLBs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - DSB to complete the TLBI.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - If you've changed the instruction stream or system state that will
> >>>>> affect the instruction stream, ISB to flush the CPU pipeline.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Here is the flow I have (as of v5 patch)
> >>>>
> >>>> Write the tables
> >>>>
> >>>> (I removed dsb here in v5, need to add back)
> >>>>
> >>>> Write TTBR
> >>>>
> >>>> (I missed isb here, need to add)
> >>>>
> >>>> Flush dcache (otherwise the table will not be in DDR. Yes, I verified)
> >>>
> >>> This looks odd -- why do we need the tables to be in DDR? Why would we
> >>> flush them here, when the address is partially visible to the MMU?
> >>
> >> This sounds odd but it actually makes sense. Let's say we have new tables
> >> created by u-boot. The new tables are in the address of DDR with D-cache
> >> enabled. If we don't flush the cache, the moment TLBs are invalidated, MMU will
> >> fetch the tables from TTBR which points to DDR. Without a valid TLB, MMU cannot
> >> get the table from D-cache, it has to fetch from the DDR directly. I have
> >> verified this by checking waveforms of the SoC and exercised code in both ways.
> >
> > How is TCR_EL2.SH0 (or TCR_EL1.SH*) configured?
> >
> > You'll only need to flush the cache if they're configured non shareable.
>
> It is configured as non shareable.
Is there any reason not to configure them as inner shareable? That way
the MMU will look in the D-cache, and you won't have to spend time
flushing them.
Cheers,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 20:49 [U-Boot] [Patch v4 1/5] Added 64-bit MMIO accessors for ARMv8 York Sun
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 2/5] ARMv8: Adjust MMU setup York Sun
2014-06-02 11:34 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-02 16:06 ` York Sun
2014-06-02 18:01 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-04 16:27 ` York Sun
2014-06-05 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-05 15:07 ` York Sun
2014-06-05 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-05 18:34 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 12:33 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-06 14:54 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 17:32 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-06-06 17:37 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 20:17 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 22:14 ` York Sun
2014-06-10 9:15 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-10 16:04 ` York Sun
2014-06-13 19:41 ` York Sun
2014-06-18 14:09 ` fenghua at phytium.com.cn
2014-06-18 15:44 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 13:34 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-06 14:52 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 16:09 ` Tom Rini
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 3/5] ARMv8/FSL_LSCH3: Add FSL_LSCH3 SoC York Sun
2014-06-11 14:05 ` fenghua at phytium.com.cn
2014-06-11 14:55 ` York Sun
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 4/5] armv8/fsl-lsch3: Add support to load and start MC Firmware York Sun
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 5/5] ARMv8/ls2100a_emu: Add LS2100A emulator and simulator board support York Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140606173243.GC18918@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox