[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/5] sunxi: add USB EHCI driver

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Sunday, July 27, 2014 at 12:22:31 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 18:31 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>  > On Friday, July 25, 2014 at 06:06:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>  > > On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 17:41 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> <snip>
> 
>  > > > If you pick all but 2/5 right now, I am happy with that. It will
>  > > > prevent conflicts. I will pick 2/5 only after that . Let's do it
>  > > > like that. Roman will also have to resend only 2/5 once fixed.
>  > > 
>  > > Some patches (e.g. #5) don't make much sense without #2, but they are
>  > > harmless and when things eventually meet in whichever upstream tree it
>  > > should all (hopefully!) burst into life. Does that sound ok?
>  > 
>  > Yes, let's do it this way please. I will pick a new version of 2/5 only,
>  > you pick the rest now.
> 
> I've been working on u-boot-sunxi next today to add support for more boards
> upstream, and I thought it would be good to cherry pick this set first so
> that I can add the necessary CONFIG_USB_EHCI in boards.cfg for boards
> which support this right away, but this causes builds to fail, e.g. :
> 
> drivers/usb/host/built-in.o: In function `usb_lowlevel_stop':
> /home/hans/projects/sunxi/u-boot/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:923: undefined
> reference to `ehci_hcd_stop' drivers/usb/host/built-in.o: In function
> `usb_lowlevel_init':
> /home/hans/projects/sunxi/u-boot/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:935: undefined
> reference to `ehci_hcd_init' arm-linux-gnu-ld.bfd: BFD version
> 2.24.0-4.fc21 20140613 assertion fail
> ../../binutils-2.24/bfd/elf32-arm.c:7696 arm-linux-gnu-ld.bfd: BFD version
> 2.24.0-4.fc21 20140613 assertion fail
> ../../binutils-2.24/bfd/elf32-arm.c:7696 arm-linux-gnu-ld.bfd: error:
> required section '.rel.plt' not found in the linker script
> arm-linux-gnu-ld.bfd: final link failed: Invalid operation
> Makefile:986: recipe for target 'u-boot' failed
> 
> So merging 1 and 3-5 to the sunxi tree while merging 2 through your
> (Marek's) tree does not seem to be the best idea. I think it would be best
> to take this patch (patch 2) through the sunxi tree too, with your ack
> (once your happy with it).
> 
> Roman, this means that it would be nice to get a v4 from you soon, so that
> we can line up the next bunch of patches for mainline.

OK, then please pick them all up.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut