From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: tegra: remove custom define for Jetson TK1
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:12:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801121237.D509.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406849378-32034-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:29:38 -0600
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> Now that Kconfig has a per-board option, we can use that directly rather
> than inventing a custom define for the AS3722 code to determine which
> board it's being built for.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> board/nvidia/venice2/as3722_init.h | 2 +-
> configs/jetson-tk1_defconfig | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/nvidia/venice2/as3722_init.h b/board/nvidia/venice2/as3722_init.h
> index a7b24039f6aa..06c366e0d0d8 100644
> --- a/board/nvidia/venice2/as3722_init.h
> +++ b/board/nvidia/venice2/as3722_init.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> #define AS3722_LDO6VOLTAGE_REG 0x16 /* VDD_SDMMC */
> #define AS3722_LDCONTROL_REG 0x4E
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_JETSON_TK1
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_JETSON_TK1
> #define AS3722_SD0VOLTAGE_DATA (0x3C00 | AS3722_SD0VOLTAGE_REG)
> #else
> #define AS3722_SD0VOLTAGE_DATA (0x2800 | AS3722_SD0VOLTAGE_REG)
> diff --git a/configs/jetson-tk1_defconfig b/configs/jetson-tk1_defconfig
> index 9ce97c9f61b2..6926257d894b 100644
> --- a/configs/jetson-tk1_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/jetson-tk1_defconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> CONFIG_SPL=y
> -CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="BOARD_JETSON_TK1="
> +S:CONFIG_ARM=y
> +S:CONFIG_TARGET_JETSON_TK1=y
> --
> 1.9.1
Or you may rename CONFIG_TARGET_JETSON_TK1 to CONFIG_BOARD_JETSON_TK1
or another name.
I don't want to force CONFIG_TARGET_ name convention.
You can change config names if you like. It is up to you.
FYI, this is the reason why I used CONFIG_TARGET_ when I
auto-generated the initial version of Kconfig and defconfig files:
The 'integrator' board is supported for various ARM cores such as
arm720t, ar920t, arm926ejs, arm1136. They use the same board
but different config headers.
So CONFIG_BOARD_INTEGRATOR is not an identical macro pointing to
the config header.
When I see Tegra family, each board has its own config header.
CONFIG_BOARD_ as well as CONFIG_TARGET_ will work.
In future, perhaps only the SoC select
(CONFIG_TEGRA20, _TEGRA30, _TEGRA114, _TEGRA124)
will rename in the Kconfig and
the board select might be pushed into device trees.
I am not sure..
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 23:29 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: tegra: remove custom define for Jetson TK1 Stephen Warren
2014-08-01 3:12 ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2014-08-01 18:36 ` Stephen Warren
2014-08-04 10:36 ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-08-04 16:43 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140801121237.D509.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com \
--to=yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox