[U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] arm: mx6: cm_fx6: add sata support

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 12:47:38 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 08/04/14 11:27, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 09:23:12 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >> 
> >> On 08/03/14 17:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:48 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >>>> Add support for SATA.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cc: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
> >>>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> >>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryanov <nikita@compulab.co.il>
> >>> 
> >>> I'd just squash all the cf_mx6 patches into the "add cf_mx6 board"
> >>> patch.
> >> 
> >> Well, I tend to disagree on this.
> >> I find extremely hard to review the "long long squashed into one patch"
> >> patches. It is much easier to review small, functionality oriented,
> >> patches.
> > 
> > You do have a valid point when it comes to review, all right. There's no
> > point in keeping them separate when they're applied though. Tough
> > decisions this is.
> 
> When it comes to keeping them separate when applied, I'd disagree also...
> Keeping the changes small and functionality oriented helps:
> a) bisect-ability and blaming/reverting granularity
> b) gives an opportunity to better explain the change in the commit message
> c) easier fixing of merge conflicts (if any)
> d) learning curve for new developers in the log (as to how to add
> features/fix bugs) e) a bit more burden on maintainers ;-)

I cannot disagree with neither ;-) Let's go with the split approach then

Best regards,
Marek Vasut