From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] test: dfu: script: wrong md5sum on nand partitions
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915135521.5b204300@amdc2363> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5416C406.9030907@denx.de>
Hi Heiko,
> Hello Lukasz,
>
> Am 15.09.2014 11:45, schrieb Lukasz Majewski:
> > Hi Heiko,
> >
> >> Hello Stephen,
> >>
> >> add Lukasz to Cc ...
> >>
> >> Am 12.09.2014 16:53, schrieb Stephen Warren:
> >>> On 09/12/2014 12:27 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>>> when uplaoding a file, at least from a nand partition, the
> >>>> complete mtd nand partition size is transferred. This leads in a
> >>>> wrong md5sum as the filesize is different between the downloaded
> >>>> file and the uploaded file. Limit the uploaded filesize to the
> >>>> downloaded fixes this.
> >>>
> >>> I was going to say that it'd be better to fix U-Boot's NAND code
> >>> to transfer the correct amount of data. However, I suppose the
> >>> correct amount *is* the whole partition for anything other than a
> >>> filesystem file. As such, I'd suggest replacing "nand" in the
> >>> patch description with something else, since presumably the exact
> >>> same issue applies to partitions on eMMC. The issue applies to any
> >>> partition.
> >>
> >> Yes, you are right.
> >
> > It is the case with testing "raw"/"partition" write.
> >
> > With NAND the procedure is as follows:
> > 1. Erase NAND (0xFF on the whole partition)
> > 2. Store the new partition (very rarely the partition.img == NAND
> > partition size). Very often partition.img< NAND partition.
> > 3. The NAND code reads the whole partition (including the 0xFF
> > padding).
> >
> > This padding causes md5sum to be wrong.
>
> Yes.
>
> >>> I wonder if there's a way to distinguish between file tests and
> >>> partition tests in dfu_gadget_test.sh, so that the $N_FILE_FULL ->
> >>> $N_FILE conversion can be applied only for partitions. Otherwise,
> >>> a file upload/download test could end up changing (increasing) the
> >>> file length and this bug wouldn't be detected.
> >>
> >> Lukasz could better comment on this ... currently filesize is
> >> changed on a raw partition, as the test download for example 960
> >> bytes, and reads back the hole partition size ... which leads in a
> >> wrong md5sum.
> >>
> >> It would be good to have in the DFU protcol a length parameter ...
> >> so a device could at transfer start decide, if the filesize fits
> >> into the partition, if not, no need to tranfser the hole file, and
> >> detect this error at the end (with a broken partition now) ...
> >
> > Yes, the lack of "size" parameter is very inconvenient (for example
> > we must then allocate bigger buffers than needed).
> >
> > However, for testing purposes we can introduce new test file name
> > "part_<file_size>.img" - e.g. part_32M.img.
> > Then this would indicate the test for the whole partition.
>
> Hmm... yes, but I fear, that every board has different partition size,
> so we need a lot of files ...
>
> > The legacy dat_<file_size>.img (e.g. dat_960.img) would be
> > truncated if needed in the script.
> >
> > This is a quick solution.
>
> Yes ... I do not prefer this solution. Why not cutting the readden
> file to the length we transferred?
I think that the truncation of the received file is acceptable.
If we were about to test partition write, then we could prepare images
with the size equal to the partition size.
> Or fill the original file with
> 0xff until we reached the filesize we read from the device?
>
> > Other thoughts:
> >
> > 1. In the dfu-util repo there is the dfu-prefix tool. It allows
> > generating some special prefix for LPC and TI Stellaris SoCs.
> > Maybe we could think about "u-boot" prefix and put there for example
> > binary size and signature data.
>
> Hmm.. I do not like such special headers ... but this is just a
> personal opinion ...
>
> > 2. The dfu-util 0.7 on the HOST when -l is typed shows the name=""
> > and serial="". If it was possible to add serial, then we could
> > extend dfu-util to show size of the alt setting.
>
> [root at ts8 ~]# dfu-util -l
> dfu-util 0.7
>
> Copyright 2005-2008 Weston Schmidt, Harald Welte and OpenMoko Inc.
> Copyright 2010-2012 Tormod Volden and Stefan Schmidt
> This program is Free Software and has ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
> Please report bugs to dfu-util at lists.gnumonks.org
>
> Found DFU: [0908:02c5] devnum=0, cfg=1, intf=0, alt=0, name="spl"
> Found DFU: [0908:02c5] devnum=0, cfg=1, intf=0, alt=1,
> name="spl.backup1" Found DFU: [0908:02c5] devnum=0, cfg=1, intf=0,
> alt=2, name="spl.backup2" Found DFU: [0908:02c5] devnum=0, cfg=1,
> intf=0, alt=3, name="spl.backup3" Found DFU: [0908:02c5] devnum=0,
> cfg=1, intf=0, alt=4, name="u-boot" Found DFU: [0908:02c5] devnum=0,
> cfg=1, intf=0, alt=5, name="kernel_a" Found DFU: [0908:02c5]
> devnum=0, cfg=1, intf=0, alt=6, name="kernel_b" Found DFU:
> [0908:02c5] devnum=0, cfg=1, intf=0, alt=7, name="rootfs" [root at ts8
> ~]#
>
> I do not see "serial=" for the siemens boards ...
This is strange. Could you checkout and build following dfu-util
version:
Repository:
dfu-util-repo git://gitorious.org/dfu-util/dfu-util.git
SHA1: dc15eefbb8f928aed932fa1e8daa341e34d0b096
With exynos I see the serial="" output.
>
> But if we could add here a "size", that would be a good thing to
> have, so we coud at least read the size, and if our image fits not
> in it, break the transfer, before starting it ...
>
> and for the test script, we could read the size, and create a
> file, which fits into the partition ...
>
> > In this way we could always perform truncation on the uploaded file
> > in the host.
>
> bye,
> Heiko
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-12 6:27 [U-Boot] [PATCH] test: dfu: script: wrong md5sum on nand partitions Heiko Schocher
2014-09-12 14:53 ` Stephen Warren
2014-09-15 5:32 ` Heiko Schocher
2014-09-15 9:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-09-15 10:48 ` Heiko Schocher
2014-09-15 11:55 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2014-09-17 20:48 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140915135521.5b204300@amdc2363 \
--to=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox