From: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Discussion topics / issues
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:11:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141009221154.GA24774@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201410091603.48309.marex@denx.de>
Hi!
> I don't this Albert is the problem, I am starting to suspect we simply lack
> custodian manpower in general. And I also suspect we're not quite inviting
> and attractive crowd, which is something we should discuss too ...
As I said privately, I believe we have way too many custodians...
Anyway, u-boot code looks similar to kernel code, but patch submission
rules are really different.
Something like this could help..?
Pavel
--- /dev/null 2014-10-09 01:15:57.354292026 +0200
+++ doc/SubmittingPatches 2014-10-09 23:58:53.058883776 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Differences from kernel:
+
+* SPDX license headers are required.
+
+* puts() is preffered over single-argument prinf()
+
+* later versions of patch should come with "diff changelog" below "---"
+
+* subject should begin with tags, such as "arm: socfpga:"
+
+* should pass checkpatch
\ No newline at end of file
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 12:45 [U-Boot] [SoCFPGA] next steps Marek Vasut
2014-10-08 8:58 ` Michal Simek
2014-10-08 10:39 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-08 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-08 20:09 ` Tom Rini
2014-10-09 8:37 ` Michal Simek
2014-10-09 11:20 ` Jagan Teki
2014-10-09 13:42 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-09 16:11 ` Jagan Teki
2014-10-09 16:15 ` [U-Boot] Discussion topics / issues Marek Vasut
2014-10-09 16:41 ` Jagan Teki
2014-10-09 14:03 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-09 14:45 ` Michal Simek
2014-10-09 15:57 ` Tom Rini
2014-10-09 16:10 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-09 16:25 ` Tom Rini
2014-10-09 16:29 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-09 22:11 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2014-10-09 22:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-10-09 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-10 12:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-10-10 14:04 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2014-10-10 14:26 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-10 14:35 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-10-10 16:09 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2014-10-10 19:51 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-10-10 20:40 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2014-10-10 21:13 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-10-11 15:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-10-11 15:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-10-15 8:40 ` [U-Boot] puts() and newlines (was Re: Discussion topics / issues) Pavel Machek
2014-10-15 9:42 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-20 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2014-10-11 14:44 ` [U-Boot] Discussion topics / issues Wolfgang Denk
2014-10-12 15:06 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2014-10-09 23:05 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-10 11:05 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-10-10 12:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-10-10 0:12 ` Tom Rini
2014-10-08 13:18 ` [U-Boot] [SoCFPGA] next steps Dinh Nguyen
2014-10-08 19:05 ` Marek Vasut
2014-10-11 18:22 ` Masahiro YAMADA
2014-10-19 21:19 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141009221154.GA24774@amd \
--to=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox