From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:19:08 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 14/14] RFC: Deprecate MAKEALL In-Reply-To: <20141022165944.B91A03832AC@gemini.denx.de> References: <1409240626-6924-3-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <1409240626-6924-15-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <20141014081724.GF25506@bill-the-cat> <20141022083327.EEE7F3834D1@gemini.denx.de> <20141022160936.GY25506@bill-the-cat> <20141022165944.B91A03832AC@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <20141022171908.GC25506@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20141022160936.GY25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > I think for Wolfgang's case that might just have to be handled with an > > external wrapper, translating all of the ways to run MAKEALL into > > Yes, you are right, an external wrapper would work, too. Silly me. > > OTOH, why not keep a script under the old name that provides such > functionality to translate calls to the buildman API? My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one board, am335x_evm_config but buildman am335x_evm builds the whole family of configs. For a build test bisect run, that's fine (even if not optimal in that it'll build more than required). In fact if I read things right (Simon?) buildman is bad for a single board/config. If we map out MAKEALL's -m/-M to just fail and say use get_maintainer.pl I think we can "good enough" map out everything else. With perhaps an echo to please use buildman directly when possible? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: