From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:37:53 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/25] ppc: Zap ICU862 board In-Reply-To: <20141023112607.EB5D.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> References: <20141020185529.A4F673833B9@gemini.denx.de> <201410222110.28867.marex@denx.de> <20141023112607.EB5D.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> Message-ID: <201410241637.54039.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 04:26:07 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Marek, Hello! > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:10:28 +0200 > > Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday, October 20, 2014 at 08:55:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > Dear Marek, > > > > > > In message <201410201649.49448.marex@denx.de> you wrote: > > > > Ah, you're right, we have this thing. One thing I'm not sure about is > > > > how is someone supposed to determine the commit in which the board > > > > was removed before the commit was created in the upstream > > > > repository. This kinda doesn't add up to me. > > > > > > You just insert place holders for the boards you are touching, and fix > > > up older entries that already hit mainline. > > > > I wonder if we shouldn't get rid of this README.scrapyard. Personally, I > > don't find much value in it to be honest ; if I am looking for some > > ancient board, I just do git log -p and search for whatever I need. > > I stick to it if this rule is a decision of u-boot community, but I have > also been wondering it. It is true we need some effort to maintain this > file. > > Maybe you should open a new thread to discuss removal of > doc/README.scrapyard. You're right, done! Best regards, Marek Vasut