From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:01:54 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] kconfig: arm: introduce symbol for ARM
 CPUs
In-Reply-To: <CAMhH57RqGY9AM=CBOWwGREjTyBFdA16hTO0RdpMQTbhN_oqiwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1411847291-1790-1-git-send-email-savoundg@gmail.com>
	<1414362326-6290-1-git-send-email-savoundg@gmail.com>
	<1414362326-6290-2-git-send-email-savoundg@gmail.com>
	<CAMhH57S-Zd7ku_0n37p7VqsiaJ38811nEfpf7ZVp1GuwOQ3Lhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141027180953.4ff80201@lilith>
	<CAMhH57RqGY9AM=CBOWwGREjTyBFdA16hTO0RdpMQTbhN_oqiwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20141028080154.109cacdd@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hello Masahiro,

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 02:23:42 +0900, Masahiro YAMADA
<yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> Hi Albert,
> 
> 
> 2014-10-28 2:09 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>:
> >> Tom and Albert,
> >>
> >> If Georges fixes those problems, is it possible to apply it shortly on
> >> the mainline?
> >> (directly u-boot/master? or via u-boot-arm/master?)
> >
> > I'm ok with this patch going in (through either tree). However:
> >
> >> Since this patch easily causes conflicts, it should not get stuck for
> >> a long time.
> >
> > I'm not sure I'm getting this right. Do yo mean that once the patch is
> > in, it should be easy to detect and iron out issues because if some
> > boards are broken, their users will react promptly?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> If some conflicts happen, CONFIG_SYS_CPU will not be set correctly
> and those boards will fail to build.
> User will notice the issue soon.

I often run 'buildman ... aarch64 arm' as a measure of the cleanliness
of the ARM repo. Would just applying this patch automatically cause lots
of ARM boards to fail building?

> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.