[U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.01-rc1 released

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:04:39PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Bie?mann wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > On 11/10/2014 10:29 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > > 
> > > I've pushed v2015.01-rc1 out to the repository and tarballs should exist
> > > soon.
> > > 
> > > The merge window is now closed.  Per both the min-summit and the follow
> > > up emails, I'm going to try and get into the every 2 week RC tagging
> > > groove.  And, I'm going to be relying on everyones best judgement about
> > > what level of changes they're going to put into a pull request to me.
> > > 
> > > When I do a buildman of most things I see:
> > >   blackfin: +   ip04
> > >        arm: +   Ippo_q8h_v5 novena openrd_base maxbcm openrd_ultimate openrd_client tricorder db-mv784mp-gp Linksprite_pcDuino3_fdt tricorder_flash cm_t3517
> > 
> > there must be something wrong:
> 
> Compiler fun!  With Linaro 2013.03 gcc 4.7.3 we're 260 bytes over the
> limit on SPL.  With ELDK 5.4's 4.7.x we're 543 bytes under the limit.
> What I think I had been thinking was that you could move
> CONFIG_SPL_STACK into DDR and bump the max size a bit or based on
> CONFIG_FLASHCARD or not build NAND or MMC into MLO but not both (and
> that'd be a bigger size savings).
> 
> Or maybe the answer is that I need to stop using that Linaro toolchain
> for 4.7.x testing.

... ELDK 5.5.x also has a similar slight size overflow and is 4.8.x.  I
guess for now I'll default to use ELDK 5.4 for ARM but people may need
to consider a something-something for newer toolchains sooner rather
than later.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20141112/2ff1d68c/attachment.pgp>