From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:43:55 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/3] Kconfig: Add EXPERT option In-Reply-To: <5465C44C.605@redhat.com> References: <1415954071-5934-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1415954071-5934-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20141114095541.0647d77c@lilith> <5465C44C.605@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20141120154355.GD21184@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/14/2014 09:55 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hello Hans, > > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:34:29 +0100, Hans de Goede > > wrote: > >> From: Tom Rini > >> > >> For similar reasons to why the Linux Kernel has an EXPERT option, we too > >> want an option to allow for tweaking of some options that while normally > >> should remain hidden, may need to be changed in some cases. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > >> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada > >> Acked-by: Hans de Goede > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > >> --- > > > > As you're just resending Tom's patch, should it have your own > > Signed-off-by? No need to post v6 if you think this should be > > corrected, I would do it when applying. > > AFAIK it is normal to add a Signed-off-by when a patch passes through > ones hands / tree. But I'm fine with having it removed, either way > works for me. I don't have a preference either way. We don't add S-o-B lines as often as the kernel does but I don't want to make people worry about that when switching between kernel and u-boot work either. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: