From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Query on CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:22:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141121132226.7ae6f75c@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjblltju.fsf@nbsps.com>
Hello Bill,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:34:45 -0500, Bill Pringlemeir
<bpringlemeir@nbsps.com> wrote:
> Originally Daniel Gutson used '-mauto-it' and then it was converted to
> '-mimplicit-it'.
Ok, so I was right in my gut(son)[1] feeling that -mauto-it was a
predecessor of -mimplicit-it -- and actually only in the first
iteration(s) of the patch that would have introduced it.
> I am not sure if '-mauto-it' exists in the wild. I have never heard of
> that option before seeing this email thread. Also my assembler says,
>
> Assembler messages:
> Error: unrecognized option -mauto-it
>
> I have built with the most recent binutils, gcc4.9.1 using crosstool-ng.
> Maybe only some non-mainline tools picked up this '-mauto-it' patch. I
> don't think it hurts to support '-mauto-it', but an assembler test
> should be done to see if it accepts the option.
I've gone through the binutils git tree, and -mauto-it is mentioned
only in a patch that fixes the gas /docs/ which erroneously mentioned
-mauto-it where it should have mentioned -mimplicit-it.
Hence, I think we should not test for -mauto-it at all, and not
mention it even.
Stefan, can you resubmit without the -mauto-it part, and renaming
AFLAGS_AUTOIT into AFLAGS_IMPLICIT_IT?
> hth,
> Bill Pringlemeir.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
[1] I am never ashamed of doing lame puns.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 16:29 [U-Boot] Query on CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD Victor Ascroft
2014-11-13 20:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-14 4:30 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-14 5:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-14 6:10 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-14 14:01 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-14 15:26 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-15 1:56 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-15 5:26 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-15 5:38 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-15 12:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-15 22:10 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-16 7:50 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-17 6:28 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-18 3:32 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-18 4:59 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-18 12:10 ` Stefan Agner
2014-11-18 16:07 ` Stefan Agner
2014-11-18 18:37 ` Stefan Agner
2014-11-19 6:42 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-19 6:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-19 16:31 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-11-19 17:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-19 18:34 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-11-20 12:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-20 16:34 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-11-21 12:22 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141121132226.7ae6f75c@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox