From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:49:08 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] Nokia RX-51: Use generic board In-Reply-To: <20150130141953.GS10826@bill-the-cat> References: <1421313996-27865-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20150130141953.GS10826@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <201501301549.08981@pali> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday 30 January 2015 15:19:53 Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > Generic board with #define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD is > > working fine. There is no visible difference between legacy > > and generic board code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Roh?r > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks! Tom, or anybody else, in future when you are going to change some parts in u-boot and remove boards which do not convert in time... please can you contact me about it (via email, I see that contact info in file board/nokia/rx51/MAINTAINERS is correct)? I'm not following u-boot ML and I really did not know that conversion to generic board code is required before end of last year... Basically Maemo users & developers use uboot v2013.04 version and for Nokia N900 there is no new functionality in new uboot versions. So there is nothing like "new features & fixed bugs" motivation. But I do not want to see n900 board code removed from uboot as uboot bootloader is for n900 really useful (most for end-users who does not even know about existence of git, uboot ML, etc). -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: