[U-Boot] u-boot sunxi fel plan for v2015.04

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 05:38:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 15-02-15 15:43, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> >On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:50:49 -0500
> >Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:19:08AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>>Hi Siarhei and Simon,
> >>>
> >>>I'm wondering what the plan is wrt sunxi FEL booting for u-boot
> >>>v2015.04 I know that you both have been working on this, and I
> >>>think that for v2015.04 Simon's latest set probably is the best
> >>>way forward for now, we're going to need parts of that set
> >>>anyways for the more complete solution Siarhei has.
> >>>
> >>>we could replace the patch adding all the #ifdef's to start.S
> >>>with code saving / restoring PCR15 and friends, that would be
> >>>more cleaner.
> >>>
> >>>So I see 2 ways forwards for v2014.05
> >>>
> >>>1) Go with Simon's latest set as is.
> >>>2) Take the first patches from Simon's set and replace the
> >>>on adding he #ifdef's to start.S with one saving / restoring
> >>>the necessary regs
> >>>
> >>>I've a slight preference for 2. Siarhei, can you perhaps prepare
> >>>a patch-set for 2 for merging for v2014.05 ?
> >>
> >>And when everyone is happy I'll take it via the sunxi tree (And try and
> >>see about giving it a spin on my Lime2).  Thanks!
> >
> >Thanks for clarifying this.
> >
> >Simon, could you please confirm that you are not going to do anything
> >anymore with the third patch from your sunxi FEL fixes set?
> >
> >Hans, could you please queue Simon's patches in the sunxi next branch
> >just like Tom suggested (and after the status of the third patch becomes
> >more clear)?
> 
> I'm fine with taking Simon's patch-set as is, and upstreaming it through
> the sunxi tree, but the start.S changes are not really sunxi specific, so I
> think they need Alberts ack?
> 
> Tom are you ok with taking these without Albert's ack?

[ Oops, looks like Albert wasn't on the To list at one point and thus
part of the delay? ]

> 
> And/or Albert can we have your ack for:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437580/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437581/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437582/
> 
> (the 2nd one is not really ARM specific, but still)

I've looked them over and I think we're somewhere between "safe enough
and correct" and "there's still time to re-work things more if Albert
wants a different approach".  So if there's still time today lets get
that part moving along, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150216/af5a035a/attachment.sig>