* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model
@ 2015-01-26 16:55 Simon Glass
2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles Simon Glass
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This series includes a few more patches aimed at getting rid of gdata, the
parallel global_data structure introduced on some ARM boards.
This series relies on this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/423789/
Changes in v2:
- Remove gdata definition from ARM spl header file also
Simon Glass (3):
ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles
Revert "Revert "ARM: SPL: do not set gd again""
arm: spl: Avoid setting up a duplicate global data structure
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c | 6 +-----
arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h | 2 --
arch/arm/lib/spl.c | 12 ------------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles 2015-01-26 16:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-26 17:10 ` Tom Rini 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "Revert "ARM: SPL: do not set gd again"" Simon Glass ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot The stack is already set to CONFIG_SPL_STACK immediately before board_init_f() is called, so this should not be needed. Also global_data has already been set up so we don't want to mess with it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> --- Changes in v2: None arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c index 59b304e..f8caf2a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c @@ -36,9 +36,6 @@ void putc(char c) void board_init_f(ulong dummy) { - /* First, setup our stack pointer. */ - asm volatile("mov sp, %0\n" : : "r"(CONFIG_SPL_STACK)); - /* Second, perform our low-level init. */ #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM365 dm36x_lowlevel_init(0); @@ -50,8 +47,7 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) /* Third, we clear the BSS. */ memset(__bss_start, 0, __bss_end - __bss_start); - /* Finally, setup gd and move to the next step. */ - gd = &gdata; + /* Finally, move to the next step. */ board_init_r(NULL, 0); } -- 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 17:10 ` Tom Rini 2015-01-26 18:12 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2015-01-26 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > The stack is already set to CONFIG_SPL_STACK immediately before > board_init_f() is called, so this should not be needed. > > Also global_data has already been set up so we don't want to mess with > it. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> > --- > > Changes in v2: None We should drop this one in favor of the 2 I posted that fixes some other problems and gets the boards booting too (and as a bonus drops the custom board_init_f() func). :) -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150126/3bda90b1/attachment.pgp> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles 2015-01-26 17:10 ` Tom Rini @ 2015-01-26 18:12 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Tom, On 26 January 2015 at 10:10, Tom Rini <trini@ti.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > >> The stack is already set to CONFIG_SPL_STACK immediately before >> board_init_f() is called, so this should not be needed. >> >> Also global_data has already been set up so we don't want to mess with >> it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: None > > We should drop this one in favor of the 2 I posted that fixes some other > problems and gets the boards booting too (and as a bonus drops the > custom board_init_f() func). :) Yes that's fine, thanks. Please go ahead. One way or another we will get rid of gdata. Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "Revert "ARM: SPL: do not set gd again"" 2015-01-26 16:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: spl: Avoid setting up a duplicate global data structure Simon Glass 2015-02-25 6:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Albert ARIBAUD 3 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot This reverts commit 1ee30aeed47724eb7c8f145f064b8d03cd294808. We should now be able to avoid the global_data fiddling that was previously required for some boards. So re-apply this patch that was reverted. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> --- Changes in v2: None arch/arm/lib/spl.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/spl.c b/arch/arm/lib/spl.c index c41850a..7c9afbd 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/spl.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/spl.c @@ -33,9 +33,6 @@ void __weak board_init_f(ulong dummy) /* Clear the BSS. */ memset(__bss_start, 0, __bss_end - __bss_start); - /* TODO: Remove settings of the global data pointer here */ - gd = &gdata; - board_init_r(NULL, 0); } -- 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: spl: Avoid setting up a duplicate global data structure 2015-01-26 16:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "Revert "ARM: SPL: do not set gd again"" Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-25 6:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Albert ARIBAUD 3 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot This is already set up in crt0.S. We don't need a new structure and don't really want one in the 'data' section of the image, since it will be empty and crt0.S's changes will be ignored. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> --- Changes in v2: - Remove gdata definition from ARM spl header file also arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h | 2 -- arch/arm/lib/spl.c | 9 --------- 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h index 8acd7cd..e5dbab0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/spl.h @@ -33,6 +33,4 @@ enum { /* Linker symbols. */ extern char __bss_start[], __bss_end[]; -extern gd_t gdata; - #endif diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/spl.c b/arch/arm/lib/spl.c index 7c9afbd..6361a62 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/spl.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/spl.c @@ -13,15 +13,6 @@ #include <image.h> #include <linux/compiler.h> -/* Pointer to as well as the global data structure for SPL */ -DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; - -/* - * WARNING: This is going away very soon. Don't use it and don't submit - * pafches that rely on it. The global_data area is set up in crt0.S. - */ -gd_t gdata __attribute__ ((section(".data"))); - /* * In the context of SPL, board_init_f must ensure that any clocks/etc for * DDR are enabled, ensure that the stack pointer is valid, clear the BSS -- 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-01-26 16:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Simon Glass ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: spl: Avoid setting up a duplicate global data structure Simon Glass @ 2015-02-25 6:28 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-25 13:27 ` Simon Glass 3 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-25 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hello Simon, I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be applied exactly? Amicalement, -- Albert. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-25 6:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-25 13:27 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-25 14:00 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-02-25 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Albert, On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > Hello Simon, > > I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; > seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series > too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be > applied exactly? I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series starting here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ The cover letter is here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 So that is all now. Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-25 13:27 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-02-25 14:00 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-25 20:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-02-25 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Albert, On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: >> Hello Simon, >> >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be >> applied exactly? > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series > starting here: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ > > The cover letter is here: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 > > So that is all now. It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-25 14:00 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-02-25 20:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-26 10:34 ` Albert ARIBAUD 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-25 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hello Simon, On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > >> Hello Simon, > >> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be > >> applied exactly? > > > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series > > starting here: > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ > > > > The cover letter is here: > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 > > > > So that is all now. > > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4. > Regards, > Simon Amicalement, -- Albert. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-25 20:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-26 10:34 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-26 15:57 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-26 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hello Albert, On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > Hello Simon, > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> > wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > > > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Hi Albert, > > > > > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > > >> Hello Simon, > > >> > > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; > > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series > > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be > > >> applied exactly? > > > > > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series > > > starting here: > > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ > > > > > > The cover letter is here: > > > > > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 > > > > > > So that is all now. > > > > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the > > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working > > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. > > No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4. V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a try at u-boot-dm/spl-working. Amicalement, -- Albert. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-26 10:34 ` Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-26 15:57 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-26 17:06 ` Albert ARIBAUD 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-02-26 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Albert, On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > Hello Albert, > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD > <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: >> Hello Simon, >> >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> > Hi Albert, >> > >> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: >> > > Hi Albert, >> > > >> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: >> > >> Hello Simon, >> > >> >> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; >> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series >> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be >> > >> applied exactly? >> > > >> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series >> > > starting here: >> > > >> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ >> > > >> > > The cover letter is here: >> > > >> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 >> > > >> > > So that is all now. >> > >> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the >> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working >> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. >> >> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4. > > V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a > try at u-boot-dm/spl-working. OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied something up. I can resend if you like. Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-26 15:57 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-02-26 17:06 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-26 17:20 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-26 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hello Simon, On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:57:05 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > > Hello Albert, > > > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD > > <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > >> Hello Simon, > >> > >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Albert, > >> > > >> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: > >> > > Hi Albert, > >> > > > >> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > >> > >> Hello Simon, > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; > >> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series > >> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be > >> > >> applied exactly? > >> > > > >> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series > >> > > starting here: > >> > > > >> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ > >> > > > >> > > The cover letter is here: > >> > > > >> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 > >> > > > >> > > So that is all now. > >> > > >> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the > >> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working > >> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. > >> > >> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4. > > > > V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a > > try at u-boot-dm/spl-working. > > OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied > something up. I can resend if you like. Well, if you can re-send rebase over current u-boot[-arm]/master, that would be nice. :) > Regards, > Simon Amicalement, -- Albert. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model 2015-02-26 17:06 ` Albert ARIBAUD @ 2015-02-26 17:20 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-02-26 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Albert, On 26 February 2015 at 10:06, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: > Hello Simon, > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:57:05 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> > wrote: >> Hi Albert, >> >> On 26 February 2015 at 03:34, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: >> > Hello Albert, >> > >> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:57:36 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD >> > <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: >> >> Hello Simon, >> >> >> >> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:23 -0700, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Albert, >> >> > >> >> > On 25 February 2015 at 06:27, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> > > Hi Albert, >> >> > > >> >> > > On 24 February 2015 at 23:28, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote: >> >> > >> Hello Simon, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> I'm a bit (read: almost completely) lost re all the gdata removal stuff; >> >> > >> seems like there is/was this series, and there is the 9-patch series >> >> > >> too, and possibly others... Right now, what patch( seri)es should be >> >> > >> applied exactly? >> >> > > >> >> > > I picked up everything I thought was relevant and sent a v4 series >> >> > > starting here: >> >> > > >> >> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/438581/ >> >> > > >> >> > > The cover letter is here: >> >> > > >> >> > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/211429 >> >> > > >> >> > > So that is all now. >> >> > >> >> > It does need a rebase due to the mach-tegra file move, but the >> >> > conflict is trivial. Just in case, I have updated u-boo-dm/spl-working >> >> > with a rebased version. Let me know if I should send v5. >> >> >> >> No need for a v5 just for the mach-* move IMO. I'll look at v4. >> > >> > V4 seems not to apply properly on u-boot[-arm]/master ATM. I'll give a >> > try at u-boot-dm/spl-working. >> >> OK, I used mainline and also I rebased so git may have tidied >> something up. I can resend if you like. > > Well, if you can re-send rebase over current u-boot[-arm]/master, that > would be nice. :) But that doesn't include Masahiro's SPL config change, so it doesn't build. Can you either resync to mainline, or I can apply via the driver model tree if you add your Ack. I will send v5 just so that it is clean. Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-26 17:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-01-26 16:55 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ti: davinci: Remove unnecessary stack and global_data fiddles Simon Glass 2015-01-26 17:10 ` Tom Rini 2015-01-26 18:12 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "Revert "ARM: SPL: do not set gd again"" Simon Glass 2015-01-26 16:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: spl: Avoid setting up a duplicate global data structure Simon Glass 2015-02-25 6:28 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean out SPL ready for driver model Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-25 13:27 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-25 14:00 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-25 20:57 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-26 10:34 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-26 15:57 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-26 17:06 ` Albert ARIBAUD 2015-02-26 17:20 ` Simon Glass
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox