public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [VOTING REQUIRED] Re: U-Boot mini summit
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 17:02:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504210231.GE5267@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504153136.5B6E1380A4A@gemini.denx.de>

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:31:36PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 Stefano Babic wrote:
> 
> > Hi everybody,
> > 
> > there were some rumours about next U-Boot mini summit and why there is
> > not yet a date. The reason is that we at DENX are thinking about, taking
> > into account that the U-Boot community is steadily increased, which is
> > the best location for the next summit. We know that a lot of you are in
> > US or, generally, outside Europe and maybe it is time to ask everybody
> > where the next summit will take place - and maybe the result will not be
> > in Europe.
> > 
> > Surely, the summit should be part of an Event organized by the Linux
> > Foundation, and taking into account the embedded nature of the
> > bootloader, there are two possible candidates:
> > 
> > 	- ELCE in Dublin, 5-7 October 2015
> > 	- ELC in San Diego, 4-6 April 2016
> > 
> > Wolfgang has prepared a "doodle" survey to collect availability and
> > preferences. Feel free to add your name to the event(s) you would like
> > to participate.
> > 
> > 	http://doodle.com/8mf8xhhbsugtirpa
> > 
> > This survey runs until 10, May 2015 - after that we will know where to
> > meet for the U-Boot summit.
> > 
> > Thanks everybody for improving U-Boot !
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Stefano Babic
> 
> 
> I would like to point out that the poll will be ending on Sunday,
> i. e. within less than a week, and so far we have just 16 votes,
> or only 9 if we exclude the DENX team.
> 
> This cannot be true?  Is there really so little interest in a U-Boot
> developer meeting?  In this case we should probably consider not
> doing such an event at all?  Or just a tiny one at DENX ;-)
> 
> Not even Tom and the majority of the custodians bothered to vote...
> 
> Are you all sleeping?  Hey, WAKE UP, this is YOUR event, if you want
> to have it in a location which you can conveniently reach, then speak
> up NOW!

*snore* Hunh? What? Crap...

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150504/ac85f07d/attachment.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-14 11:32 [U-Boot] U-Boot mini summit Stefano Babic
2015-05-04 15:31 ` [U-Boot] [VOTING REQUIRED] " Wolfgang Denk
2015-05-04 16:42   ` Joe Hershberger
2015-05-04 17:30   ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 18:59   ` Angelo Dureghello
2015-05-04 21:02   ` Tom Rini [this message]
2015-05-08  9:02   ` Wolfgang Denk
2015-05-11 18:45     ` [U-Boot] [VOTING RESULTS] " Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150504210231.GE5267@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox