From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:32:00 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Clean all defconfigs with savedefconfig In-Reply-To: References: <1431364127-1340-1-git-send-email-joe.hershberger@ni.com> <20150512151813.GE5267@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20150512163200.GA5729@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:20:07AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:32:40PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Joe Hershberger > >> wrote: > >> > In order to reduce merge conflicts and to maintain the simplest possible > >> > defconfig files, we should be using the savedefconfig feature of Kconfig > >> > every time a new feature is added. This keeps the defconfig settings to > >> > a minimum (only those things not default) and keeps them in the same > >> > order as the Kconfig options. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger > >> > Cc: Masahiro Yamada > >> > >> This is easy to generate, but as you can imagine it will become a > >> conflict rapidly. Please let me know if you choose to wait past today > >> on this... if you do, let me know when you want to pull it in and I > >> can generate it again. We should coordinate. > > > > I'm taking what you and Stephen talked about as "changes will be coming" > > and not applying this patch. > > That's correct. I'm running a test now. Are you about to push more > changes that include defconfig or Kconfig changes or am I safe with > the current HEAD to generate this patch? You're safe to continue. Please cc Stephen on that one since I'll want his ack before I grab it. Thanks! -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: