From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 16:48:29 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] ARMv8: replace CONFIG_ARM64 with builtin
 __aarch64__
In-Reply-To: <20150414103446.5718fce8@lilith>
References: <1422951025-31086-1-git-send-email-fenghua@phytium.com.cn>
 <20150414103446.5718fce8@lilith>
Message-ID: <20150603164829.7ca4f771@lilith>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:34:46 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:
> Hello fenghua at phytium.com.cn,
> 
> On Tue,  3 Feb 2015 16:10:25 +0800, fenghua at phytium.com.cn
> <fenghua@phytium.com.cn> wrote:
> > From: David Feng <fenghua@phytium.com.cn>
> > 
> > This patch replace CONFIG_ARM64 with gcc builtin __aarch64__.
> > CONFIG_ARM64 is still needed in makefile and config.mk.
> > Maybe them could be replace with something like *_V8 later.
> 
> If CONFIG_ARM64 is still needed, then it will remain available, so
> there is no /need/ to replace it in source code. There may be
> an /interest/ in replacing it though, but it is not stated here. What
> would this be?

I don't think I got an answer to my question so far. Did I miss it?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.