From: Peng Fan <b51431@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/6] imx: add dummpy cpu type MXC_CPU_MX6QP/DP
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:06:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710080559.GA30751@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559F82C3.6030201@denx.de>
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:30:59AM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
>Hi Peng,
>
>in the title "dummpy" instead of "dummy".
Thanks pointing this out.
>
>On 30/06/2015 04:36, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Add dummy cpu type MXC_CPU_MX6QP/DP.
>
>Anyway, why is it dummy ? It matches a real SOC, only the check is done
>in another way.
Just like MXC_CPU_MX6Q and MXC_CPU_MX6D. MXC_CPU_MX6D is a dummy id,
MXC_CPU_MX6Q is the real id. Same MXC_CPU_MX6QP/DP are also dummy id.
Since I want to print correct CPU info, so I use this way, but not
change arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c.
>
>> Since i.MX6QP use a revision 2, but with
>> cpu type i.MX6Q, we need the MXC_CPU_MX6QP and to decrease major with 1 to
>> let print_cpuinfo print the correct info.
>
>I understand well the code, not so well the text here. Maybe does it
>help simply to write that MX6 with MAJOR_LOWER >= 2 are plus ?
>
Only for 6QP/DP. Not for all MX6 with MAJOR_LOWER >= 1.
>>
>> This patch also fix is_mx6dqp(), since get_cpu_rev can return MXC_CPU_MX6QP
>> and MXC_CPU_MX6DP, we should use:
>> (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6QP) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6DP)).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes v4:
>> Address Fabio's comments, Change Quad-Plus to Dual-Plus for i.MX6DP.
>>
>> Changes v3:
>> New patch
>> This patch is to make print_cpuinfo display correct cpu info, also fix
>> is_mx6dqp
>>
>> Changes v2:
>> none
>>
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c | 4 ++++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx/cpu.h | 2 ++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/sys_proto.h | 4 +---
>> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
>> index 29de624..d3a3b2e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
>> @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
>> struct anatop_regs *anatop = (struct anatop_regs *)ANATOP_BASE_ADDR;
>> u32 reg = readl(&anatop->digprog_sololite);
>> u32 type = ((reg >> 16) & 0xff);
>> - u32 major;
>> + u32 major, cfg = 0;
>>
>> if (type != MXC_CPU_MX6SL) {
>> reg = readl(&anatop->digprog);
>> struct scu_regs *scu = (struct scu_regs *)SCU_BASE_ADDR;
>> - u32 cfg = readl(&scu->config) & 3;
>> + cfg = readl(&scu->config) & 3;
>> type = ((reg >> 16) & 0xff);
>> if (type == MXC_CPU_MX6DL) {
>> if (!cfg)
>> @@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
>>
>> }
>> major = ((reg >> 8) & 0xff);
>> + if ((major >= 1) &&
>
>Everything fine, but I have not understood this line, please help me.
>major is the revision number and should be at least 2 for a QP or DP.
>But you check that it can be >=, that is revision 1.x is accepted as
>Plus. Or am I wrong ?
To i.MX6, MAJOR_LOWER is from 0,1,2... maybe larger.
I have no knowledge whether major_lower with 2,3,4... is also called DQPlus.
6QP/DP is major_lower >= 1, major_lower 0 is for 6DQ. Now ">= 1" can work
for 6QP/DP, just check "== 1" may not a good idea.
Is this clear to explain why this patch?
The reason for this patch is to print correct cpuinfo:
printf("CPU: Freescale i.MX%s rev%d.%d",
get_imx_type((cpurev & 0xFF000) >> 12),
(cpurev & 0x000F0) >> 4,
(cpurev & 0x0000F) >> 0);
As Fabio's comments, should print i.MX6QP 1.0, but i.MX6Q rev2.0.
>
>> + ((type == MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || (type == MXC_CPU_MX6D))) {
>> + major--;
>> + type = MXC_CPU_MX6QP;
>> + if (cfg == 1)
>> + type = MXC_CPU_MX6DP;
>> + }
>> reg &= 0xff; /* mx6 silicon revision */
>> return (type << 12) | (reg + (0x10 * (major + 1)));
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c b/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c
>> index 5e56cfe..096d22e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c
>> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ unsigned imx_ddr_size(void)
>> const char *get_imx_type(u32 imxtype)
>> {
>> switch (imxtype) {
>> + case MXC_CPU_MX6QP:
>> + return "6QP"; /* Quad-Plus version of the mx6 */
>> + case MXC_CPU_MX6DP:
>> + return "6DP"; /* Dual-Plus version of the mx6 */
>> case MXC_CPU_MX6Q:
>> return "6Q"; /* Quad-core version of the mx6 */
>> case MXC_CPU_MX6D:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx/cpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx/cpu.h
>> index 4715f4e..99e0e32 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx/cpu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-imx/cpu.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>> #define MXC_CPU_MX6Q 0x63
>> #define MXC_CPU_MX6D 0x64
>> #define MXC_CPU_MX6SOLO 0x65 /* dummy ID */
>> +#define MXC_CPU_MX6DP 0x68
>> +#define MXC_CPU_MX6QP 0x69
>>
>> #define CS0_128 0
>> #define CS0_64M_CS1_64M 1
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/sys_proto.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/sys_proto.h
>> index 28c77a4..eee8ca8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/sys_proto.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/sys_proto.h
>> @@ -30,9 +30,7 @@ const char *get_imx_type(u32 imxtype);
>> unsigned imx_ddr_size(void);
>> void set_chipselect_size(int const);
>>
>> -#define is_mx6dqp() ((is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || \
>> - is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6D)) && \
>> - (soc_rev() >= CHIP_REV_2_0))
>> +#define is_mx6dqp() (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6QP) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6DP))
>>
>> /*
>> * Initializes on-chip ethernet controllers.
>>
>
>
>Best regards,
>Stefano Babic
>
>--
>=====================================================================
>DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
>HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
>Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
>=====================================================================
Regards,
Peng.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 2:36 [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/6] imx: add dummpy cpu type MXC_CPU_MX6QP/DP Peng Fan
2015-06-30 2:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/6] imx: mx6: ccm: Change the clock settings for i.MX6QP Peng Fan
2015-07-10 8:34 ` Stefano Babic
2015-06-30 2:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 3/6] imx: mx6: hab : Remove the cache issue workaroud in hab " Peng Fan
2015-07-10 8:35 ` Stefano Babic
2015-06-30 2:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 4/6] imx: mx6qp Enable PRG clock for IPU Peng Fan
2015-07-10 8:35 ` Stefano Babic
2015-06-30 2:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 5/6] imx: mx6sabresd/sabreauto runtime setting fdt_file Peng Fan
2015-07-10 8:35 ` Stefano Babic
2015-06-30 2:36 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 6/6] imx: mx6qpsabreauto: Add MX6QP SABREAUTO CPU3 board support Peng Fan
2015-07-10 8:30 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/6] imx: add dummpy cpu type MXC_CPU_MX6QP/DP Stefano Babic
2015-07-10 8:06 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2015-07-10 13:08 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150710080559.GA30751@shlinux2 \
--to=b51431@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox