From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: ls1021a: Ensure LS1021 ARM Generic Timer CompareValue Set 64-bit
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150715091426.GA9627@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436944385-28323-1-git-send-email-b18965@freescale.com>
Hi,
Isn't this the same patch as a couple of days ago [2], which I replied
to [3]?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:13:05AM +0100, Alison Wang wrote:
> This patch addresses a problem mentioned recently on this mailing list:
> [1].
>
> In that posting a LS1021 based system was locking up at about 5 minutes
> after boot, but the problem was mysteriously related to the toolchain
> used for building u-boot. Debugging the problem reveals a stuck
> interrupt 29 on the GIC.
>
> It appears Freescale's LS1021 support in u-boot erroneously sets the
> 64-bit ARM generic PL1 physical time CompareValue register to all-ones
> with a 32-bit value. This causes the timer compare to fire 344 seconds
> after u-boot configures it. Depending on how fast u-boot gets the
> kernel booted, this amounts to about 5-minutes of Linux uptime before
> locking up.
If as in [2] this is an attempt to not generate interrupts that Linux
doesn't expect, it would be far better to simply disable the timer
interrupt before leaving U-Boot, ensuring that unexpected interrupts are
never generated regardless of the width or rate of the counter.
There are bits in CNTP_CTL to do this.
Thanks,
Mark.
[2] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-July/218937.html
[3] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-July/218979.html
> Apparently the bug is masked by some toolchains. Perhaps this is
> explained by default compiler options, word sizes, or binutils versions.
> At any rate this patch makes the manipulation explicitly 64-bit which
> alleviates the issue.
>
> [1]
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-June/014400.html
> Signed-off-by: Chris Kilgour <techie@whiterocker.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/timer.c | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/timer.c
> index 11b17b2..e6a32ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ls102xa/timer.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static inline unsigned long long us_to_tick(unsigned long long usec)
> int timer_init(void)
> {
> struct sctr_regs *sctr = (struct sctr_regs *)SCTR_BASE_ADDR;
> - unsigned long ctrl, val, freq;
> + unsigned long ctrl, freq;
> + unsigned long long val;
>
> /* Enable System Counter */
> writel(SYS_COUNTER_CTRL_ENABLE, &sctr->cntcr);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
> index ee547fb..34854da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
> #define RCWSR4_SRDS1_PRTCL_SHIFT 24
> #define RCWSR4_SRDS1_PRTCL_MASK 0xff000000
>
> -#define TIMER_COMP_VAL 0xffffffff
> +#define TIMER_COMP_VAL 0xffffffffffffffffull
> #define ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE (1 << 0)
> #define SYS_COUNTER_CTRL_ENABLE (1 << 24)
>
> --
> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 7:13 [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: ls1021a: Ensure LS1021 ARM Generic Timer CompareValue Set 64-bit Alison Wang
2015-07-15 9:14 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-07-15 9:34 ` Huan Wang
2015-07-17 10:01 ` Huan Wang
2015-07-17 10:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-17 14:32 ` Huan Wang
2015-07-17 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-17 14:35 ` Huan Wang
2015-08-17 6:55 ` [U-Boot] " Alexander Stein
2015-11-30 16:59 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " York Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150715091426.GA9627@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox