From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert ARIBAUD Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:21:05 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand: lpc32xx: add SLC NAND controller support In-Reply-To: <4F172219764C784B84C2C1FF44E7DFB102FF1324@003FCH1MPN2-042.003f.mgd2.msft.net> References: <1436905437-19149-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> <20150715090509.243306f6@lilith> <55A61E7D.8000001@mleia.com> <20150715112119.10a2db4e@lilith> <4F172219764C784B84C2C1FF44E7DFB102FF1324@003FCH1MPN2-042.003f.mgd2.msft.net> Message-ID: <20150715222105.5283cc3a@lilith> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello SYLVAIN, On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:23:33 +0000, LEMIEUX, SYLVAIN wrote: > Hi Vladimir and Albert, > > During this merge window (once our issues with our exchange server > are resolve), we were planning on submitting a few patches for the > LPC32xx. > > Some of the patches are the porting of the legacy NXP BSP (u-boot) > drivers into the latest version; the drivers are the DMA, the SLC > NAND and the USB. > > This original NXP implementation of the SLC NAND was using the DMA. I > am also planning on testing this patch to compare the flashing time, > with and without the DMA. > > I have two questions: > 1) How do you suggest to approach this, as some patches may be > similar or conflicting with what Vladimir is planning on submitting? That question is for you and Vladimir to discuss. > 2) For submitting legacy NXP BSP driver porting patch, would you like > to see a 3 patches series (original driver, checkpatch script fix and > the update for latest u-boot) to have history of the change or a > single patch with the final result? Single patch with the final result. Amicalement, -- Albert.