From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] ARM: remove vpac270 board support
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:31:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201507280031.05420.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQEqB2Jkexd7=NT3Z-6FqCdNjh36-v5WXzzaKv1KQPETQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 05:58:17 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2015-07-26 17:49 GMT+09:00 Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>:
> > On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 10:26:45 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> The board-specific linker script board/vpac270/u-boot-spl.lds
> >> obstructs further cleanup. This board has not been converted to
> >> Generic Board yet in spite of the long-term warning. Remove.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >> Marek,
> >>
> >> If you want to keep this board:
> >> - Please convert it to Generic Board
> >> - Please use arch-common linker script
> >
> > Yeah, I want to keep this board, but please give me a bit of time
> > to do this. This one and the zipitz2 are the two PXA boards which
> > I have and want to keep.
> >
> > I recall the u-boot-spl.lds was really needed to keep the size of
> > the SPL under 1kiB ; without this the board was unbootable when
> > using the OneNAND.
>
> I will drop this patch when I send v2.
>
>
> BTW, I tried building vpac270 ONENAND.
> It is already over 1kiB.
>
>
>
>
> $ git describe
> v2015.07-307-g2647394
> $ make vpac270_ond_256_defconfig
> #
> # configuration written to .config
> #
> $ make -s CROSS_COMPILE=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-
> ===================== WARNING ======================
> Please convert this board to generic board.
> Otherwise it will be removed by the end of 2014.
> See doc/README.generic-board for further information
> ====================================================
> $ ls -l spl/u-boot-spl.bin
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 masahiro masahiro 2828 Jul 28 00:53 spl/u-boot-spl.bin
>
>
>
> It is over 2KB.
So the hardware spilt already? Aww :-(
I wonder, maybe converting this to TPL might be the correct solution ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-26 8:26 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] Add macros to ease our life with independent CONFIGs between U-Boot and SPL Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] ARM: remove vpac270 board support Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:49 ` Marek Vasut
2015-07-27 2:46 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-27 15:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-27 22:31 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-07-28 15:53 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-28 15:57 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-01 16:08 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-01 16:36 ` Marek Vasut
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/16] kbuild: fixdep: optimize code slightly Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] kbuild: add a makefile macro useful with per-image config options Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/16] linux/kconfig.h: add CPP macros useful for " Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/16] spl: move SPL driver entries to driver/Makefile Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] dm: unify obj-$(CONFIG_DM) and obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_DM) entries Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/16] clk: rename CONFIG_SPL_CLK_SUPPORT to CONFIG_SPL_CLK Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/16] clk: unify obj-$(CONFIG_CLK) and obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_CLK) entries Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/16] ram: rename CONFIG_SPL_RAM_SUPPORT to CONFIG_SPL_RAM Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/16] ram: unify obj-$(CONFIG_RAM) and obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_RAM) entries Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/16] led: rename CONFIG_SPL_LED_SUPPORT to CONFIG_SPL_LED Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/16] led: unify obj-$(CONFIG_LED) and obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_LED) entries Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/16] dm: drop CONFIG_DM_DEVICE_REMOVE from uncmd list Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/16] fdtdec: fix OF_CONTROL switch Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:26 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/16] of: flip CONFIG_SPL_DISABLE_OF_CONTROL into CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 8:27 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/16] of: clean up OF_CONTROL ifdef conditionals Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-26 18:38 ` Pavel Machek
2015-07-26 23:30 ` Marek Vasut
2015-07-27 1:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-27 7:05 ` Pavel Machek
2015-07-27 10:52 ` Marek Vasut
2015-07-27 12:30 ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-07-27 16:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] Add macros to ease our life with independent CONFIGs between U-Boot and SPL Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201507280031.05420.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox