From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 18:36:10 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] ARM: remove vpac270 board support In-Reply-To: References: <1437899226-14925-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <201507281757.33749.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <201508011836.10501.marex@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Saturday, August 01, 2015 at 06:08:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Marek, Hi! > On 28 July 2015 at 09:57, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 05:53:10 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> >> $ git describe > >> >> v2015.07-307-g2647394 > >> >> $ make vpac270_ond_256_defconfig > >> >> # > >> >> # configuration written to .config > >> >> # > >> >> $ make -s CROSS_COMPILE=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi- > >> >> ===================== WARNING ====================== > >> >> Please convert this board to generic board. > >> >> Otherwise it will be removed by the end of 2014. > >> >> See doc/README.generic-board for further information > >> >> ==================================================== > >> >> $ ls -l spl/u-boot-spl.bin > >> >> -rwxrwxr-x 1 masahiro masahiro 2828 Jul 28 00:53 spl/u-boot-spl.bin > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> It is over 2KB. > >> > > >> > So the hardware spilt already? Aww :-( > >> > > >> > I wonder, maybe converting this to TPL might be the correct solution ? > >> > >> Maybe, if you could split it into two images. > > > > I think I might need TPL and SPL: > > > > TPL: Load the SDRAM init code into CPU's SRAM from the OneNAND > > SPL: Load big U-Boot from OneNAND into the main SDRAM > > > > ... or maybe we should just sacrifice the machine in the name of progress > > and be done with it. I don't know when I might have time to fix it > > afterall. > > Well it sounds like it is already broken. It worries me that SPL has > somehow got larger though - any reason for that? I think the machine was always quite borderline and stuffing the SPL into it was always a bit hackish. The changes to the SPL probably just exposed this hackishness. Best regards, Marek Vasut