From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/11] dm: serial: Update binding for PL01x serial UART
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:13:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150813181346.GS25532@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CCBFB2.7050301@wwwdotorg.org>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:02:58AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 09:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >Hi Linus,
> >
> >On 11 August 2015 at 07:00, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>This binding differs from that of Linux. Update it and change existing
> >>>users.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> >>(...)
> >>> doc/device-tree-bindings/serial/pl01x.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>
> >>So why does U-Boot have its own copy of any bindings at all?
> >>
> >>This is forking the ontology of who gets to define bindings I fear.
> >>It's a bit like have two bibles both claiming to be the word of god.
> >>(OK maybe a hyperbolic statement, but you see what I mean.)
> >>
> >>Can't we just have the bindings in the Linux kernel tree please?
> >
> >Is there any plan to move them out of Linux and put them in a separate place?
> >
> >We should make an effort to sync the device tree files with Linux periodically.
> >
> >I quite like having the bindings in U-Boot since it makes people think
> >about what they are adding. Are you worried that the bindings in
> >U-Boot might evolve separately? Certainly there has been some of that.
> >
> >However I recently sent a series to add a few things for Raspberry Pi
> >("arm: rpi: Device tree modifications for U-Boot") and I don't yet see
> >a willingness to add what some see as 'U-Boot things' to the binding.
> >How do we address that?
>
> DT isn't supposed to contain "U-Boot things", but "an OS-agnostic
> description of the hardware". So, I imagine the solution is not to
> attempt to do that:-)
This always makes me ask if the FreeBSD folks or VxWorks folks have
adopted the "Linux" bindings or if the DT files continue to be
"OS-agnostic" and "only functional with Linux". It was a while ago last
I looked but it made my head hurt a little doing a quick translation for
an SoC that I was familiar with.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150813/72970d1a/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-07 13:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/11] arm: rpi: Enable USB and Ethernet driver model Raspberry Pi Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/11] dm: serial: Update binding for PL01x serial UART Simon Glass
2015-08-11 3:57 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 4:11 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-11 4:24 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 13:00 ` Linus Walleij
2015-08-13 15:59 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-13 16:02 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-13 18:13 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2015-08-13 19:04 ` Ian Lepore
2015-08-13 19:37 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-14 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-14 10:22 ` Linus Walleij
2015-08-14 14:27 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-14 17:45 ` Ian Lepore
2015-08-14 18:42 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-17 7:46 ` Linus Walleij
2015-08-14 19:32 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2015-08-13 22:24 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 02/11] arm: rpi: Define CONFIG_TFTP_TSIZE to show tftp size info Simon Glass
2015-08-11 3:58 ` Stephen Warren
2016-05-23 15:39 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 03/11] arm: rpi: Bring in kernel device tree files Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 04/11] arm: rpi: Device tree modifications for U-Boot Simon Glass
2015-08-11 4:00 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-11 4:17 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-11 4:25 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-12 13:28 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 05/11] arm: rpi: Add device tree files for Raspberry Pi 2 Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/11] arm: rpi: Enable device tree control for Rasberry Pi Simon Glass
2015-08-11 3:47 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-14 19:20 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-15 3:32 ` Stephen Warren
2015-08-15 13:59 ` Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 07/11] arm: rpi: Enable device tree control for Rasberry Pi 2 Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 08/11] arm: rpi: Drop the UART console platform data Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/11] arm: rpi: Drop the GPIO " Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 10/11] arm: rpi: Move to driver model for USB Simon Glass
2015-08-07 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 11/11] arm: rpi: Use driver model for Ethernet Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150813181346.GS25532@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox