From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:27:58 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] Make RBTREE selectable by Kconfig In-Reply-To: References: <1433925663-3713-1-git-send-email-poeschel@lemonage.de> <20150610150848.GA11174@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> <20150728082529.GA13915@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> Message-ID: <20150818192758.GL25532@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:47:20PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Lars, > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Hershberger > wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Hershberger > > wrote: > >> Hi Lars, > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Lars Poeschel wrote: > >>> Hi Joe, > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:59AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: > >>>> >> I beat you to it: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-May/214261.html > >>>> > > >>>> > Well, ... ok. You won ;-) Your patchset is by far more comprehensive than > >>>> > mine. > >>>> > If I see this right in the archives, you did not receive any comments > >>>> > since nearly a month. > >>>> > >>>> That is true. I really would like a little feedback on it... or maybe > >>>> I can just drop the controversial one and only include these things... > >>>> they seem to be mostly straightforward. > >>>> > >>>> > This was RFC will you resend this as a "real" PATCH ? > >>>> > >>>> Yes. > >>>> > >>>> > Could you then include two of the dependencies from my patches: > >>>> > I think CMD_UBI has to depend on MTD_PARTITIONS and obivously CMD_UBIFS > > I noticed when adding MTD_PARTITIONS that MTD_DEVICE is not moved over > yet. Do you know what the dependency relationship is there? If not > I'll dig into it a bit. > > >>>> > has to depend on CMD_UBI. > >>>> > >>>> Will do. > >>> > >>> I saw no action from you on this one. Can I help out - at least for the > >>> decompression / ubi / ubifs part ? > >> > >> Sorry about that... the end of last release got a little crazy. > >> > >>> I think the setexpr / env location parts from your patchset can then go > >>> in as seperate patches. > >> > >> I agree. I'll split them apart and send these out. > > > > I haven't forgotten about this... I plan to get this sent out this week. > > I had this ready to go, but conflicts with > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508134/, so I'm gonna have to > regenerate the moves after that goes in. Note that since it's part of the E1000 series I gave it to you in patchwork :) -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: