From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/7] sf: Update status reg check in spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:02:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201508190002.34606.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439807574-26767-7-git-send-email-jteki@openedev.com>
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 12:32:53 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Current flash wait_ready logic is not modular to add new
> register status check, hence few of the logic is used from
> Linux spi-nor framework.
>
> Below are the sf speed runs with 'sf update' on whole flash, 16MiB.
>
> => sf update 0x100 0x0 0x1000000
> device 0 whole chip
> 16777216 bytes written, 0 bytes skipped in 59.564s, speed 289262 B/s
>
> => sf update 0x100 0x0 0x1000000
> device 0 whole chip
> 16777216 bytes written, 0 bytes skipped in 62.549s, speed 275036 B/s
>
> => sf update 0x100 0x0 0x1000000
> device 0 whole chip
> 16777216 bytes written, 0 bytes skipped in 61.276s, speed 284359 B/s
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <sivadur@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> Cc: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c | 76
> ++++++++++++------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 18
> insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> index 0f34450..7d7c264 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> @@ -138,72 +138,32 @@ static void spi_flash_dual_flash(struct spi_flash
> *flash, u32 *addr) }
> #endif
>
> -static int spi_flash_poll_status(struct spi_slave *spi, unsigned long
> timeout, - u8 cmd, u8 poll_bit)
> +/*
> + * Service routine to read status register until ready, or timeout occurs.
> + * Returns non-zero if error.
If you're adding this sort of description, please make it a kerneldoc.
> + */
> +int spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready(struct spi_flash *flash, unsigned long
> deadline) {
Please rename $deadline to $timeout and note in the kerneldoc that the
timeout is in mSec.
> - unsigned long timebase;
> - unsigned long flags = SPI_XFER_BEGIN;
> - int ret;
> - u8 status;
> - u8 check_status = 0x0;
> + int timeout, ret, sr;
>
> - if (cmd == CMD_FLAG_STATUS)
> - check_status = poll_bit;
> + timeout = get_timer(0);
This should be $start or something.
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SF_DUAL_FLASH
> - if (spi->flags & SPI_XFER_U_PAGE)
> - flags |= SPI_XFER_U_PAGE;
> -#endif
> - ret = spi_xfer(spi, 8, &cmd, NULL, flags);
> - if (ret) {
> - debug("SF: fail to read %s status register\n",
> - cmd == CMD_READ_STATUS ? "read" : "flag");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - timebase = get_timer(0);
> - do {
> - WATCHDOG_RESET();
> -
> - ret = spi_xfer(spi, 8, NULL, &status, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - return -1;
> + while (get_timer(timeout) < deadline) {
> + ret = spi_flash_cmd_read_status(flash, &sr);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> - if ((status & poll_bit) == check_status)
> + if (sr < 0)
> break;
> + else if (!(sr & STATUS_WIP))
> + return 0;
>
> - } while (get_timer(timebase) < timeout);
> -
> - spi_xfer(spi, 0, NULL, NULL, SPI_XFER_END);
> -
> - if ((status & poll_bit) == check_status)
> - return 0;
> -
> - /* Timed out */
> - debug("SF: time out!\n");
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> -int spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready(struct spi_flash *flash, unsigned long
> timeout) -{
> - struct spi_slave *spi = flash->spi;
> - int ret;
> - u8 poll_bit = STATUS_WIP;
> - u8 cmd = CMD_READ_STATUS;
> -
> - ret = spi_flash_poll_status(spi, timeout, cmd, poll_bit);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - if (flash->poll_cmd == CMD_FLAG_STATUS) {
> - poll_bit = STATUS_PEC;
> - cmd = CMD_FLAG_STATUS;
> - ret = spi_flash_poll_status(spi, timeout, cmd, poll_bit);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + cond_resched();
Huh ? Why do you need cond_resched() here at all ? Drop it please.
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + printf("SF: Timeout!\n");
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> int spi_flash_write_common(struct spi_flash *flash, const u8 *cmd,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 10:32 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] BAR/wait_ready logic updates Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/7] spi: zynq_spi: Remove unneeded headers Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/7] sf: Return proper bank_sel, if flash->bank_curr == bank_sel Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/7] sf: Make BAR discovery, as spi_flash_read_bar Jagan Teki
2015-08-18 7:46 ` Bin Meng
2015-08-18 8:22 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] sf: Optimize BAR write code Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/7] sf: Make flash->flags use for generic usage Jagan Teki
2015-08-18 7:53 ` Bin Meng
2015-08-18 8:31 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/7] sf: Update status reg check in spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready Jagan Teki
2015-08-18 22:02 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-08-18 22:39 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-17 10:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] sf: Add FSR support to spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready Jagan Teki
2015-08-18 22:03 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-18 22:36 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-18 22:58 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-19 7:35 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-19 7:39 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-19 8:17 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-19 20:10 ` Marek Vasut
2015-08-18 4:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] BAR/wait_ready logic updates Bin Meng
2015-08-18 5:22 ` Jagan Teki
2015-08-18 7:12 ` Bin Meng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201508190002.34606.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox