From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Fix CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUNXI handling
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:45:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150819134500.GE30520@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439668968-3882-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:02:34PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT gets used via IS_ENABLED so it must be defined
> to 1, rather then just being defined.
>
> While at remove 2 other unused NAND related defines from sunxi-common.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/sunxi-common.h b/include/configs/sunxi-common.h
> index 1abf73c..3735afb 100644
> --- a/include/configs/sunxi-common.h
> +++ b/include/configs/sunxi-common.h
> @@ -138,15 +138,10 @@
> #define CONFIG_SERIAL_TAG
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUNXI)
> -#define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_DRIVERS
> -#define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
> -
> -#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SPL_KERNEL_OFFS 0x280000
> +#define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT 1
Every other platform just use an empty define for this one, and the
only user of IS_ENABLED together with this option is the sunxi
board. Why not simply replace the IS_ENABLED by an ifdef to maintain
consistency?
AFAIK, IS_ENABLED doesn't bring anythnig to the table here.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150819/6329d7aa/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-15 20:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] sunxi_nand_spl: cleanups, auto config and bad block handling Hans de Goede
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Fix CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUNXI handling Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:11 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-19 13:45 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-08-20 6:33 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-27 12:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Drop unnecessary temp buf Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 7:22 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-08-17 8:14 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/15] sunxi_nand_spl: We only need to reset the nand chip once Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:14 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Do not bother writing the spare-area reg in syndrome mode Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:19 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-17 8:59 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 11:28 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Use SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT and only do nand init when necessary Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:20 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Make sure the DMA controller is enabled Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:21 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Turn off clocks when we're done with the nand Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:22 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-19 13:48 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-08-20 6:35 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-24 14:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Add proper cache flusing Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:22 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Use kernel driver algorithm for determining ecc_mode / _off Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:24 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Remove NAND_SUNXI_SPL_SYNDROME_PARTITIONS_END Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:27 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-17 9:05 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Add support for sun4i and sun5i SoCs Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:29 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-17 8:31 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:35 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Properly config page-size in the nand ctl register Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:29 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Parametrize lowlevel read functions Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:31 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Auto detect nand configuration parameters Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:32 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-15 20:02 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/15] sunxi_nand_spl: Add support for backup boot partitions Hans de Goede
2015-08-17 8:34 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150819134500.GE30520@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox